ArticleScientific reports2022
Mitochondrial-nuclear epistasis underlying phenotypic variation in breast cancer pathology.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- A meta-analysis and a functional study support the influence of mtDNA variant m.16519C on the risk of rapid progression of knee osteoarthritis.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2023Pooled it
- The role of mitotype variation and positive epistasis in trait differences between Saccharomyces species.Genetics · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of Novel Senescence-TIME Biomarkers for Predicting the Prognosis and Immunotherapy Responsiveness of SKCM Patients.International journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- The Single Nucleotide Substitution T → A rs2072580 Damages the CREB1 Binding Site in the BidirectionalGenes · 2025Article
- Mitochondria: a new intervention target for tumor invasion and metastasis.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Review
- Article
- Oncogenic metabolic reprogramming in breast cancer: focus on signaling pathways and mitochondrial genes.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2023Review
- Comprehensive Analyses of Ferroptosis-Related Alterations and Their Prognostic Significance in Glioblastoma.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The interplay between genes harboring single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) is vital to better understand underlying contributions to the etiology of breast cancer. Much attention has been paid to epistasis between nuclear genes or mutations in the mitochondrial genome. However, there is limited understanding about the epistatic effects of genetic variants in the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes jointly on breast cancer. We tested the interaction of germline SNPs in the mitochondrial (mtSNPs) and nuclear (nuSNPs) genomes of female breast cancer patients in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) for association with morphological features extracted from hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained pathology images. We identified 115 significant (q-value < 0.05) mito-nuclear interactions that increased nuclei size by as much as 12%. One interaction between nuSNP rs17320521 in an intron of the WSC Domain Containing 2 (WSCD2) gene and mtSNP rs869096886, a synonymous variant mapped to the mitochondrially-encoded NADH dehydrogenase 4 (MT-ND4) gene, was confirmed in an independent breast cancer data set from the Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (METABRIC). None of the 10 mito-nuclear interactions identified from non-diseased female breast tissues from the Genotype-Expression (GTEx) project resulted in an increase in nuclei size. Comparisons of gene expression data from the TCGA breast cancer patients with the genotype homozygous for the minor alleles of the SNPs in WSCD2 and MT-ND4 versus the other genotypes revealed core transcriptional regulator interactions and an association with insulin. Finally, a Cox proportional hazards ratio = 1.7 (C.I. 0.98-2.9, p-value = 0.042) and Kaplan-Meier plot suggest that the TCGA female breast cancer patients with low gene expression of WSCD2 coupled with large nuclei have an increased risk of mortality. The intergenomic dependency between the two variants may constitute an inherent susceptibility of a more severe form of breast cancer and points to genetic targets for further investigation of additional determinants of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.