Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35082270›Full record

ArticleTranslational psychiatry2022

Torture exposure and the functional brain: investigating disruptions to intrinsic network connectivity using resting state fMRI.

Belinda J Liddell, Pritha Das, Gin S Malhi, Kim L Felmingham, Tim Outhred, Jessica Cheung, Miriam Den, Angela Nickerson, Mirjana Askovic, Jorge Aroche and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Belinda J LiddellSchool of Psychology, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia. b.liddell@unsw.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8036-5864
Pritha DasDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Northern Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Gin S MalhiDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Northern Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4524-9091
Kim L FelminghamSchool of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Tim OuthredDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Northern Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2534-3635
Jessica CheungSchool of Psychology, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Miriam DenSchool of Psychology, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Angela NickersonSchool of Psychology, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Mirjana AskovicNSW Service for the Treatment and Rehabilitation of Torture and Trauma Survivors (STARTTS), Carramar, NSW, 2163, Australia.
Jorge ArocheNSW Service for the Treatment and Rehabilitation of Torture and Trauma Survivors (STARTTS), Carramar, NSW, 2163, Australia.
Mariano CoelloNSW Service for the Treatment and Rehabilitation of Torture and Trauma Survivors (STARTTS), Carramar, NSW, 2163, Australia.
Richard A BryantSchool of Psychology, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9607-819X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Torture has profound psychological and physiological consequences for survivors. While some brain structures and functions appear altered in torture survivors, it is unclear how torture exposure influences functional connectivity within and between core intrinsic brain networks. In this study, 37 torture survivors (TS) and 62 non-torture survivors (NTS) participated in a resting-state fMRI scan. Data-driven independent components analysis identified active intrinsic networks. Group differences in functional connectivity in the default mode network (DMN), salience network (SN) and central executive network (CEN) of the triple network model, as well any prefrontal network, were examined while controlling for PTSD symptoms and exposure to other potentially traumatic events. The analysis identified 25 networks; eight comprised our networks of interest. Within-network group differences were observed in the left CEN (lCEN), where the TS group showed less spectral power in the low-frequency band. Differential internetwork dynamic connectivity patterns were observed, where the TS group showed stronger positive coupling between the lCEN and anterior dorsomedial and ventromedial DMN, and stronger negative coupling between a lateral frontal network and the lCEN and anterior dorsomedial DMN (when contrasted with the NTS group). Group differences were not attributed to torture severity or dissociative symptoms. Torture survivors showed disrupted dynamic functional connectivity between a laterally-aligned lCEN that serves top-down control functions over external processes and the midline DMN that underpins internal self-referential processes, which may be an adaptive response to mitigate the worst effects of the torture experience. This study provides a critical step in mapping the neural signature of torture exposure to guide treatment development and selection.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingTortureBrainBrain MappingHumansNerve NetSurvivors

Identifiers

PMID35082270
PMCPMC8791936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.