Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35082134›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2022

Acceptability of OP/Na swabbing for SARS-CoV-2: a prospective observational cohort surveillance study in Western Australian schools.

Hannah M Thomas, Marianne J Mullane, Sherlynn Ang, Tina Barrow, Adele Leahy, Alexandra Whelan, Karen Lombardi, Matthew Cooper, Paul G Stevenson, Leanne Lester and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Hannah M ThomasTelethon Kids Institute, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia hannah.thomas@telethonkids.org.au.ORCID 0000-0003-3699-7714
Marianne J MullaneTelethon Kids Institute, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Sherlynn AngTelethon Kids Institute, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Tina BarrowTelethon Kids Institute, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Adele LeahyTelethon Kids Institute, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Alexandra WhelanTelethon Kids Institute, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Karen LombardiTelethon Kids Institute, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Matthew CooperTelethon Kids Institute, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Paul G StevensonTelethon Kids Institute, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Leanne LesterUniversity of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Andrea PadleyChild and Adolescent Health Service, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Lynn SpriggChild and Adolescent Health Service, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
David SpeersUniversity of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Adam J MerrittPathWest Laboratory Medicine Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Juli CoffinTelethon Kids Institute, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Donna CrossTelethon Kids Institute, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Peter GethingTelethon Kids Institute, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Asha C BowenTelethon Kids Institute, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
The Kids Research Institute Australia · AUThe University of Western Australia · AUEdith Cowan University · AUPathwest Laboratory Medicine · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWhen the COVID-19 pandemic was declared, Governments responded with lockdown and isolation measures to combat viral spread, including the closure of many schools. More than a year later, widespread screening for SARS-CoV-2 is critical to allow schools and other institutions to remain open. Here, we describe the acceptability of a minimally invasive COVID-19 screening protocol trialled by the Western Australian Government to mitigate the risks of and boost public confidence in schools remaining open. To minimise discomfort, and optimise recruitment and tolerability in unaccompanied children, a combined throat and nasal (OP/Na) swab was chosen over the nasopharyngeal swab commonly used, despite slightly reduced test performance. DESIGN, SETTING AND

participantsTrialling of OP/Na swabbing took place as part of a prospective observational cohort surveillance study in 79 schools across Western Australia. Swabs were collected from 5903 asymptomatic students and 1036 asymptomatic staff in 40 schools monthly between June and September 2020. OUTCOME MEASURES: PCR testing was performed with a two-step diagnostic and independent confirmatory PCR for any diagnostic PCR positives. Concurrent surveys, collected online through the REDCap platform, evaluated participant experiences of in-school swabbing.

results13 988 swabs were collected from students and staff. There were zero positive test results for SARS-CoV-2, including no false positives. Participants reported high acceptability: 71% of students reported no or minimal discomfort and most were willing to be reswabbed (4% refusal rate).

conclusionsOP/Na swabbing is acceptable and repeatable in schoolchildren as young as 4 years old and may combat noncompliance rates by significantly increasing the acceptability of testing. This kind of minimally-invasive testing will be key to the success of ongoing, voluntary mass screening as society adjusts to a new 'normal' in the face of COVID-19. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry-ACTRN12620000922976.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2AustraliaChildChild, PreschoolCommunicable Disease ControlHumansPandemicsSchoolsCOVID-19diagnostic microbiologypublic health

Identifiers

PMID35082134
PMCPMC8808315
OpenAlexW4210678917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.