Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35082103›Full record

ArticleResearch in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP2022

Mapping the resilience performance of community pharmacy to maintain patient safety during the Covid-19 pandemic.

George Peat, Janice Olaniyan, Beth Fylan, Liz Breen, Chloe Grindey, Isabel Hague, David P Alldred

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Community pharmacy resiliency during Covid-19 pandemic in Iran: A qualitative study.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

George PeatSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK; NIHR Yorkshire and Humber Patient Safety Translational Research Centre (YH PSTRC), Bradford, UK. Electronic address: gwpeat@bradford.ac.uk.
Janice OlaniyanSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK; NIHR Yorkshire and Humber Patient Safety Translational Research Centre (YH PSTRC), Bradford, UK.
Beth FylanSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK; NIHR Yorkshire and Humber Patient Safety Translational Research Centre (YH PSTRC), Bradford, UK; Yorkshire Quality and Safety Research Group, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK.
Liz BreenSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK; NIHR Yorkshire and Humber Patient Safety Translational Research Centre (YH PSTRC), Bradford, UK.
Chloe GrindeyNIHR Yorkshire and Humber Patient Safety Translational Research Centre (YH PSTRC), Bradford, UK; Yorkshire Quality and Safety Research Group, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK.
Isabel HagueNIHR Yorkshire and Humber Patient Safety Translational Research Centre (YH PSTRC), Bradford, UK.
David P AlldredNIHR Yorkshire and Humber Patient Safety Translational Research Centre (YH PSTRC), Bradford, UK; School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
University of Bradford · GBNational Patient Safety Foundation · USUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe first UK wave of the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020 placed unprecedented stress on community pharmacy. Various policies and initiatives were announced during this period to support community pharmacy to continue to perform in a manner that prioritised patient safety. However, little is understood about how these policies and initiatives were implemented by staff working in community pharmacy, and the system adaptions and responses that were initiated to maintain patient safety.

objectiveThe study aimed to investigate how staff working in UK community pharmacy during the first waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 responded and adapted to system stressors to maintain patient safety.

methodsWe adopted a qualitative interview approach, underpinned by Resilient Healthcare theory, with interview data collected between July 2020 and January 2021. Data were synthesised and analysed using Framework Analysis.

results23 community pharmacy staff from England and Scotland were interviewed. We identified five themes supported by between two and six sub-themes: 1. Covid-19, an impending threat to system; 2. Patient safety stressors during the first waves of Covid-19; 3. Altering the system, responding to system stressors; 4. Monitoring and adjusting and 5. Learning for the future.

conclusionPrivileging the accounts of community pharmacy staff working on the frontline during the pandemic illuminated how responses and adaptions were developed and deployed, how continual monitoring occurred, and the factors that supported or hindered system resilience. The key learning derived from this study can serve to shorten the gap between 'work as imagined' and 'work as done', and in doing so, support the future resilience performance of community pharmacy during future outbreaks of Covid-19 or similar events.

Indexed as

COVID-19PharmaciesHumansPandemicsPatient SafetyPharmacistsCommunity pharmacyCOVID-19 pandemicPatient safetyResilient healthcareSafety II

Identifiers

PMID35082103
PMCPMC8762922
OpenAlexW4206573532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.