Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35081904›Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2022

Patient activation and its association with symptom burden and quality of life across the spectrum of chronic kidney disease stages in England.

Winnie Magadi, Courtney J Lightfoot, Katherine E Memory, Shalini Santhakumaran, Sabine N van der Veer, Nicola Thomas, Rachel Gair, Alice C Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. The minimal clinically important difference for the patient activation measure in a culturally and linguistically diverse cohort with chronic conditions.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Winnie MagadiUK Renal Registry, Brandon House Building 20A1, Southmead Road, Bristol, BS34 7RR, UK. Winnie.Magadi@renalregistry.nhs.uk.
Courtney J LightfootLeicester Kidney Lifestyle Team, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Katherine E MemoryLeicester Kidney Lifestyle Team, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Shalini SanthakumaranUK Renal Registry, Brandon House Building 20A1, Southmead Road, Bristol, BS34 7RR, UK.
Sabine N van der VeerCentre for Health Informatics, Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Nicola ThomasSchool of Health and Social Care, London South Bank University, London, UK.
Rachel GairUK Renal Registry, Brandon House Building 20A1, Southmead Road, Bristol, BS34 7RR, UK.
Alice C SmithLeicester Kidney Lifestyle Team, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe knowledge, skills, and confidence to manage one's own health is termed patient activation and can be assessed using the Patient Activation Measure (PAM). This measure is increasingly recommended for use in chronic kidney disease (CKD), but there is a need to better understand patient activation within this population. This work aimed to explore the association of PAM with patient-reported outcomes, namely symptom burden and health-related quality of life (HRQoL), to understand the relationship between patient activation and outcomes which are of importance to people with CKD.

methodsNon-dialysis, dialysis, and kidney transplant patients from 14 renal units across England completed a survey comprising questionnaires assessing patient activation, symptom burden, and HRQoL. Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to determine HRQoL and symptom burden subgroups in the data. Multinomial logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the associations between patient activation and symptom burden and HRQoL classes separately, adjusting for age, gender, ethnicity, deprivation and treatment modality.

resultsThree thousand thirteen participants (mean age 61.5 years, 61.8% males, and 47% haemodialysis) were included in the analysis. Patient activation was strongly associated with both the HRQoL and symptom burden classes identified, with highly activated patients more likely to report higher HRQoL (P = < 0.0001; OR 29.2, 95% CI 19.5-43.9) and fewer symptoms (P = < 0.0001; OR 25.9, 95% CI 16.8-40.2).

conclusionLower activation levels are associated with a higher symptom burden and reduced HRQoL across the trajectory of CKD stages and treatment modalities. Therefore, targeted and holistic self-management support focussing on improving activation may have the potential to improve aspects of health experience which are valued by individuals living with kidney disease.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessPatient ParticipationQuality of LifeRenal Insufficiency, ChronicAdolescentAdultAgedEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresSelf ReportYoung AdultChronic kidney diseasePatient activationPatient reported outcomesQuality of lifeSymptom burden

Identifiers

PMID35081904
PMCPMC8793272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.