Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35081834›Full record

ArticleGlobal health promotion2022

Is social media, as a main source of information on COVID-19, associated with perceived effectiveness of face mask use? Findings from six sub-Saharan African countries.

Ihoghosa Iyamu, Glory Apantaku, Zeena Yesufu, Edward Adekola Oladele, Ejemai Eboreime, Barinaadaa Afirima, Emeka Okechukwu, Gabriel Isaac Kibombwe, Tolulope Oladele, Taurayi Tafuma and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health promotion, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Effect of Surgical Masks and N95 Respirators on Anxiety.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ihoghosa IyamuPan African Research Consortium, Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0003-0271-9468
Glory ApantakuPan African Research Consortium, Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria.
Zeena YesufuPan African Research Consortium, Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria.
Edward Adekola OladelePan African Research Consortium, Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0003-4999-1397
Ejemai EboreimeNational Primary Health Care Development Agency (NPHCDA), Abuja, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0001-8277-2570
Barinaadaa AfirimaPan African Research Consortium, Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria.
Emeka OkechukwuPan African Research Consortium, Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria.
Gabriel Isaac KibombwePan African Research Consortium, Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria.
Tolulope OladelePan African Research Consortium, Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria.
Taurayi TafumaPan African Research Consortium, Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria.
Okiki-Olu BadejoPan African Research Consortium, Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria.
Everline AshionoPan African Research Consortium, Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria.
Mulamuli MpofuPan African Research Consortium, Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of face masks as a public health approach to limit the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been the subject of debate. One major concern has been the spread of misinformation via social media channels about the implications of the use of face masks. We assessed the association between social media as the main COVID-19 information source and perceived effectiveness of face mask use.

methodsIn this survey in six sub-Saharan African countries (Botswana, Kenya, Malawi, Nigeria, Zambia and Zimbabwe), respondents were asked how much they agreed that face masks are effective in limiting COVID-19. Responses were dichotomised as 'agree' and 'does not agree'. Respondents also indicated their main information source including social media, television, newspapers, etc. We assessed perceived effectiveness of face masks, and used multivariable logistic models to estimate the association between social media use and perceived effectiveness of face mask use. Propensity score (PS) matched analysis was used to assess the robustness of the main study findings.

resultsAmong 1988 respondents, 1169 (58.8%) used social media as their main source of information, while 1689 (85.0%) agreed that face masks were effective against COVID-19. In crude analysis, respondents who used social media were more likely to agree that face masks were effective compared with those who did not [odds ratio (OR) 1.29, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-1.65]. This association remained significant when adjusted for age, sex, country, level of education, confidence in government response, attitude towards COVID-19 and alternative main sources of information on COVID-19 (OR 1.33, 95%CI: 1.01-1.77). Findings were also similar in the PS-matched analysis.

conclusionSocial media remains a viable risk communication channel during the COVID-19 pandemic in sub-Saharan Africa. Despite concerns about misinformation, social media may be associated with favourable perception of the effectiveness of face masks.

Indexed as

COVID-19Social MediaHumansKenyaMasksNigeriaPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19face maskshealth promotionnonpharmaceutical interventionssocial media

Identifiers

PMID35081834
PMCPMC9607963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.