Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35081751›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of health promotion : AJHP2022

Reach, Receptivity, And Beliefs Associated With the

Jamie Guillory, Laurel Curry, Matthew Farrelly, Amy Henes, Ghada Homsi, McKinley Saunders, Anna MacMonegle, Leah Fiacco, Tesfa Alexander, Janine Delahanty and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of health promotion : AJHP, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Identifying key beliefs for anti-disinformation messaging for Black adults about proposed US bans on menthol cigarettes and flavored cigars.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jamie Guillory567948Prime Affect Research, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-9765-2299
Laurel Curry6856RTI International, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1391-4859
Matthew Farrelly6856RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Amy Henes6856RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Ghada Homsi6856RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
McKinley Saunders6856RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5708-110X
Anna MacMonegle6856RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Leah Fiacco6856RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Tesfa AlexanderCenter for Tobacco Products, 4137US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MA, USA.
Janine DelahantyCenter for Tobacco Products, 4137US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MA, USA.
Debra MekosCenter for Tobacco Products, 4137US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2168-1023
Leah Hoffman90528Fors Marsh Group, Arlington, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8153-3866
Ollie Ganz242612Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.

Funding

FDA HHS HHSF223201310001BFDA HHS HHSF223201610032IIntramural FDA HHS FD999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the association between exposure to FDA's

designRepeated cross-sectional data collection design with embedded longitudinal cohort over six data collection waves.

setting30 US evaluation markets. SAMPLE: Hip Hop peer crowd-identified US youth aged 12-18 (N = 5,378). MEASURES: Self-reported brand and video ad awareness (saw any ad at least sometimes) and perceived effectiveness (1-5 scale) to describe campaign awareness and receptivity. Exogenous exposure was measured using population-adjusted broadcast and digital video impressions. Tobacco-related beliefs included beliefs about smoking risks, attitudes towards tobacco-free people and lifestyles, and normative beliefs about smoking. ANALYSIS: Descriptive analyses of awareness, receptivity, and agreement with tobacco-related beliefs. Logistic regression models to determine the relationship between broadcast and digital video impressions and beliefs.

intervention

resultsThe campaign generated a high level of reach (71% brand and 66% video ad awareness at final wave) and messages were well-received (across waves 3.5-4.1 mean perceived effectiveness scores). Higher broadcast television exposure was associated with increased agreement with five beliefs related to addiction/control, being a bad influence on family/friends, and cosmetic effects of smoking (breath and attractiveness) (ORs = 1.16-1.27, (

conclusion

Indexed as

SmokingTobacco ProductsAdolescentCross-Sectional StudiesHealth PromotionHumansSmoking PreventionTobacco UseUnited Statesadolescentmass media campaigntobacco control

Identifiers

PMID35081751
PMCPMC9258634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.