ArticleAnnals of surgery2023
A Prospective Study Using Propensity Score Matching to Compare Long-term Survival Outcomes After Robotic-assisted, Laparoscopic, or Open Liver Resection for Patients With BCLC Stage 0-A Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Article in Annals of surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
74 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.
- A meta-analytic and systematic review to compare perioperative outcomes and prognosis between robotic and conventional (laparoscopic or open) liver resection in hepatocellular carcinoma cases.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Comparison of efficacy between robotic and open hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score-matched studies.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: meta-analysis of propensity-score matched studies.BJS open · 2025Pooled it
- Radiofrequency ablation versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Interferon therapy improves survival in patients with hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma after curative surgery: a meta-analysis.Hepatology international · 2024Pooled it
- Comparison of survival and post-operation outcomes for minimally invasive versus open hepatectomy in hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of case-matched studies.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Effect of ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block on inflammatory cytokines and postoperative recovery after partial hepatectomy: a randomised clinical trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2024Trial
- Artificial intelligence and personalised medicine in liver cancer.Journal of hepatology · 2026Review
- The Role of Gut Microbiota in Liver Regeneration After Partial Hepatectomy: New Evidence From Animal and Human Studies.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026Review
- Emerging trends and outcomes in minimally invasive liver surgery: a population-based study in the Veneto region up to 2024 stratified by hospital case-volume.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Qualitative and quantitative assessment of intratumoral fat using chemical-shift MRI for predicting histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Comparison of Milan versus up-to-seven criteria for liver resection in hepatocellular carcinoma: a multi-center study on risk factors and long-term outcomes.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Effects of tryptophan combined with Limosilactobacillus reuteri M6 on the growth performance and intestinal barrier function of heat-stressed broilers.Veterinary research communications · 2026Article
- Global research trends in robot-assisted hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a visualized bibliometric analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Validation and applicability of the Tampa Difficulty Score for assessing procedural complexity in robotic liver surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Better outcomes of robotic liver resection in segment VII/VIII compared to open and laparoscopic approach.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Robotic Hepatectomy for Primary Liver Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Review
- Comparison of robotic and open liver resections for primary liver tumors: a multicenter retrospective analysis of perioperative outcomes, morbidity and mortality.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic and open liver resection for combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma patients: a propensity score-matched study.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the short- and long-term outcomes of robot-assisted (RALR), laparoscopic (LLR), or open liver resection (OLR) in the treatment of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage 0-A hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Following the Balliol IDEAL classification, long-term oncological outcomes can be used to evaluate the value of minimally invasive techniques in the treatment of HCC, and to assess whether they should become a standard practice.
methodsData from prospective cohorts of patients with BCLC stage 0-A HCC who underwent curative liver resection using OLR, LLR, or RALR at Tongji Hospital were reviewed. The short-term and long-term oncological outcomes of these 3 different surgical approaches after adequate follow-up were compared using propensity score matching to reduce selection bias.
resultsOf 369 patients included in this study (71, RALR; 141, LLR; and 157, OLR), 56 patients in each of the 3 groups were chosen for further comparison, after propensity score matching. In the minimally invasive group (RALR+LLR), both the operative time and duration of Pringle's maneuver were significantly longer than those in the OLR group; however, the length of hospital stay was significantly shorter. There were no significant differences in the other intraoperative parameters and the incidence of postoperative complications among the 3 groups. HCC recurrence in the minimally invasive group when compared with the OLR group was characterized by a significantly higher proportion of single lesion or early-stage HCC. However, there were no significant differences in the 5-year disease-free survival (63.8%, 54.4%, and 50.6%) or overall survival rates (80.8%, 78.6%, and 75.7%, respectively) among the 3 groups. Clinically significant portal hypertension was the only risk factor that negatively affected the 5-year disease-free survival rate. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that clinically significant portal hypertension, serum alpha-fetoprotein level (≥400 ng/mL), and Edmondson-Steiner grading (III+IV) were independent risk factors for poor long-term survival.
conclusionBoth robotic and laparoscopic hepatectomies were safe and effective for patients with BCLC stage 0-A HCC when compared with open hepatectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.