Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35081275›Full record

SynthesisThe clinical respiratory journal2022

Mepolizumab improves work productivity, activity limitation, symptoms, and rescue medication use in severe eosinophilic asthma.

Frank C Albers, Daniel J Bratton, Necdet B Gunsoy, Sarah M Cockle, Rafael Alfonso-Cristancho, Gert-Jan Braunstahl

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The clinical respiratory journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01691521 phase3completednot on this map

MEA115588 A Randomised, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Multi-centre Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Mepolizumab Adjunctive Therapy in Subjects With Severe Uncontrolled Refractory Asthma

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlaxoSmithKlineRan2012 to 2014Enrolled580ConditionsAsthmaArmsMepolizumab IV, Mepolizumab SC, IV Placebo, SC Placebo
NCT02281318 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Multi-centre 24-week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Mepolizumab Adjunctive Therapy in Subjects With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma on Markers of Asthma Control

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlaxoSmithKlineRan2014 to 2016Enrolled556ConditionsAsthmaArmsMepolizumab, Placebo, SOC
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Patient-centred outcomes in severe asthma: fatigue, sleep, physical activity and work.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Frank C AlbersRespiratory Medical Franchise, GSK, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7039-4621
Daniel J BrattonClinical Statistics, GSK, Uxbridge, UK.
Necdet B GunsoyValue Evidence and Outcomes, GSK, Uxbridge, UK.
Sarah M CockleValue Evidence and Outcomes, GSK, Brentford, UK.
Rafael Alfonso-CristanchoValue Evidence and Outcomes, GSK, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7060-5131
Gert-Jan BraunstahlDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Health Economics and Outcomes Research (United Kingdom) · GBBrunel University of London · GBGlaxoSmithKline (United States) · USNorth Carolina Clinical Research · USSint Franciscus Gasthuis · NL

Funding

GlaxoSmithKline
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma experience daily activity limitations and reduced productivity at work. Using anonymized individual patient-level data from two previously conducted randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies (MENSA [GSK ID:115588/NCT01691521]; MUSCA [GSK ID:200862/NCT02281318]), we investigated the effect of mepolizumab on work productivity, activity limitation, symptoms, and rescue medication use. Patient-reported outcomes including Work Productivity and Activity Impairment-General Health (WPAI-GH) scores (impairment percentages, 0%-100%), global activity limitation (scale 1-4), and perceived change in activity limitation (Likert scale 1-7) since the start of the study were analyzed. WPAI-GH scores from MENSA were analyzed post hoc for employed patients using mixed model repeated measures; global activity limitation and perceived change in activity limitation from MUSCA were analyzed by ordinal logistic regression. Mean changes from baseline in daily asthma symptom scores (scale 0-5) and rescue medication use (occasions/day) were also assessed, via a post hoc meta-analysis of MENSA and MUSCA. At study end, WPAI-GH scores indicative of overall work impairment, impairment while working, and activity impairment consistently improved with mepolizumab versus placebo. Overall, 76% versus 54% of patients rated their activity as "much better," "better," or "slightly better" since the start of the study with mepolizumab versus placebo. Mepolizumab was associated with numerically larger improvements from baseline in asthma symptoms (treatment difference 0.21-0.29 points) and rescue medication use (treatment difference -0.08 to -0.22 occasions/day) versus placebo. Our results indicate that patients with severe eosinophilic asthma may experience improved activity limitation, work productivity, symptoms, and rescue medication use with mepolizumab.

Indexed as

Anti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDouble-Blind MethodHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedmepolizumabactivities of daily livingeosinophilic asthmapatient-reported outcomesquestionnairesymptom assessmentwork productivity

Identifiers

PMID35081275
PMCPMC9060075
OpenAlexW4210761342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.