Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35081190›Full record

SynthesisEnvironmental science. Processes & impacts2022

Emerging investigator series: microplastic sources, fate, toxicity, detection, and interactions with micropollutants in aquatic ecosystems - a review of reviews.

Mohamed Ateia, Gamze Ersan, Mohamed Gar Alalm, Daria Camilla Boffito, Tanju Karanfil

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Environmental science. Processes & impacts, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Scientometric analysis of electrocatalysis in wastewater treatment: today and tomorrow.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohamed AteiaUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, Center for Environmental Solutions & Emergency Response, Cincinnati, OH, USA. ibrahim.mohamed@epa.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3524-5513
Gamze ErsanDepartment of Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences, Clemson University, Anderson, SC 29625, USA. tkaranf@clemson.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8785-1304
Mohamed Gar AlalmDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, C.P. 6079, Succ. CV Montréal, H3C 3A7 Québec, Canada.
Daria Camilla BoffitoDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, C.P. 6079, Succ. CV Montréal, H3C 3A7 Québec, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5252-5752
Tanju KaranfilDepartment of Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences, Clemson University, Anderson, SC 29625, USA. tkaranf@clemson.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0986-5628

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hundreds of review studies have been published focusing on microplastics (MPs) and their environmental impacts. With the microbiota colonization of MPs being firmly established, MPs became an important carrier for contaminants to step inside the food web all the way up to humans. Thus, the continuous feed of MPs into the ecosystem has sparked a multitude of scientific concerns about their toxicity, characterization, and interactions with microorganisms and other contaminants. The reports of common subthemes have agreed about many findings and research gaps but also showed contradictions about others. To unravel these equivocal conflicts, we herein compile all the major findings and analyze the paramount discrepancies among these review papers. Furthermore, we systematically reviewed all the highlights, research gaps, concerns, and future needs. The covered focus areas of MPs' literature include the sources, occurrence, fate, existence, and removal in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), toxicity, interaction with microbiota, sampling, characterization, data quality, and interaction with other co-contaminants. This study reveals that many mechanisms of MPs' behavior in aquatic environments like degradation and interaction with microbiota are yet to be comprehended. Furthermore, we emphasize the critical need to standardize methods and parameters for MP characterization to improve the comparability and reproducibility of the incoming research.

Indexed as

MicroplasticsWater Pollutants, ChemicalEcosystemEnvironmental MonitoringHumansPlasticsReproducibility of ResultsMicroplasticsPlasticsWater Pollutants, Chemical

Identifiers

PMID35081190
PMCPMC9723983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.