ArticleRhode Island medical journal (2013)2022
Antenatal Depression and Cesarean Delivery Among Recently-Delivered Nulliparous Women in Rhode Island.
Article in Rhode Island medical journal (2013), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Psychiatric disorders during pregnancy in asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 positive women: Prevalence and effect on outcome.Psychiatry research · 2023Article
- The Association of Antenatal Depression and Cesarean Delivery among First-Time Parturients: A Population-Based Study.American journal of perinatology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAntenatal depression (AD) is frequently cited as a risk factor for cesarean delivery (CD) with limited supporting data. STUDY
designWe utilized 2016-2018 data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) survey for the state of Rhode Island. Nulliparous women who reported AD (n=242) were compared to women who did not (n=1,081). Maternal demographics, pregnancy and delivery characteristics were compared by AD status using population-weighted bivariable analyses and multivariable logistic regression.
results17.7% reported AD, and 34% underwent CD. There was no difference in CD based on reported AD status (aOR 1.04; 95% CI 0.69, 1.56). However, there were significant differences between those reporting AD compared to those who did not: less education, more public insurance, use of Women, Infants and Children (WIC) benefits, tobacco use, and pre-gestational hypertension/diabetes.
conclusionIn this large, population-based, state representative sample, we found no difference in CD among recently delivered nulliparous women with and without AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35081186PMC10304038W4210821314What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.