Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35081149›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2022

Perception and practice of self-medication with antibiotics among medical students in Sudanese universities: A cross-sectional study.

Osman Kamal Osman Elmahi, Reem Abdalla Elsiddig Musa, Ahd Alaaeldin Hussain Shareef, Mohammed Eltahier Abdalla Omer, Mugahid Awad Mohamed Elmahi, Randa Ahmed Abdalrheem Altamih, Rayan Ibrahim Hamid Mohamed, Tagwa Faisal Mohamed Alsadig

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Community pharmacist intervention in doxycycline self-medication for acne among pregnant women in Saudi Arabia.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Osman Kamal Osman ElmahiFaculty of Medicine, Ibn Sina University, Khartoum, Sudan.ORCID 0000-0002-8672-3255
Reem Abdalla Elsiddig MusaFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Bahkt Alruda, Ed Dueim, Sudan.
Ahd Alaaeldin Hussain ShareefFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gadarif, Gadarif, Sudan.
Mohammed Eltahier Abdalla OmerFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gadarif, Gadarif, Sudan.
Mugahid Awad Mohamed ElmahiFaculty of Medicine, University of Gezira, Wad Madani, Sudan.
Randa Ahmed Abdalrheem AltamihFaculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan.
Rayan Ibrahim Hamid MohamedFaculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan.
Tagwa Faisal Mohamed AlsadigDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Alzaiem Alazhari University, Khartoum, Sudan.
Gadarif University · SDAlzaiem Alazhari University · SDIbn Sina Hospital · KWUniversity of Bakhtalruda · SDUniversity of Gezira · SDUniversity of Khartoum · SD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe benefits of antibiotics are under threat by self-medication, which culminated in economic burdening of developing countries, treatment failures, the emergence of antibiotic-resistant strains of bacteria and an increased probability of exposure and infection of the general population by antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains.

objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the knowledge and attitude of medical students in Sudan towards the use of antibiotics, the prevalence of self-medication with antibiotics among medical students in Sudan and to identify risk factors which promote self-medication with antibiotics. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis was a cross-sectional, descriptive and institution-based study, between November 2020 and May 2021. 1,110 medical students were selected by multistage cluster sampling. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors of self-medication with antibiotics among the study participants.

resultsThe median knowledge score was 7 out of a maximum of 10 (IQR: 5-8). A moderately positive attitude was observed among the participants (Median: 7/10; IQR: 6-8). Knowledge and attitude scores were significantly associated with academic year and monthly allowance (p < 0.05). 675 (60.8%) self-medicated with antibiotics within the previous 12 months, mostly from community pharmacies (321/675; 47.5%). Antibiotics were most commonly used to treat respiratory tract infections (38.1%) and cough (30.4%). Chi-square analysis demonstrated that self-medication with antibiotics was significantly associated with gender, year of study and monthly income.

conclusionsUndergraduate medical students had moderate knowledge and attitude towards antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance, and an alarmingly high prevalence of self-medication with antibiotics. This highlights the urgent need for tighter legislation regarding the sales of antibiotics in community pharmacies by the state and federal health ministries.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeSelf MedicationStudents, MedicalUniversitiesAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMalePerceptionPilot ProjectsRisk FactorsSudanAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID35081149
PMCPMC8791537
OpenAlexW3139363680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.