Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35081132›Full record

ArticlePloS one

Younger generations are more interested than older generations in having non-domesticated animals as pets.

Katherine A Cronin, Maureen Leahy, Stephen R Ross, Mandi Wilder Schook, Gina M Ferrie, Andrew C Alba

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine A CroninAnimal Welfare Science Program, Lincoln Park Zoo, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3208-4870
Maureen LeahyAnimal Welfare Science Program, Lincoln Park Zoo, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Stephen R RossLester E. Fisher Center for the Study and Conservation of Apes, Lincoln Park Zoo, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Mandi Wilder SchookAnimals, Science and Environment, Disney's Animal Kingdom®, Lake Buena Vista, Florida, United States of America.
Gina M FerrieAnimals, Science and Environment, Disney's Animal Kingdom®, Lake Buena Vista, Florida, United States of America.
Andrew C AlbaAnimals, Science and Environment, Disney's Animal Kingdom®, Lake Buena Vista, Florida, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8446-574X
Lincoln Park Zoo · USWalt Disney (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The trade and private ownership of non-domesticated animals has detrimental effects on individual animals and their wild populations. Therefore, there is a need to understand the conditions that motivate and dissuade interest in non-domesticated pet ownership. Past research has demonstrated that the way in which non-domesticated animals are portrayed in images influences the public's perception that they are suitable as pets. We conducted an online survey of people residing in the United States to investigate how viewing images that could be realistically captured in the zoo and broader tourism industries impact the degree to which people report interest in having that animal as a pet. We focused on two species, reticulated pythons (Malayopython reticulatus) and two-toed sloths (Choloepus hoffmanni), and presented each species in six different visual contexts. After viewing an image, respondents reported interest in pet ownership on a four-point Likert scale. Each species was studied separately in a between-subjects design and results were analyzed using ordinal logistic regression models. Thirty-nine percent of respondents reported interest in sloth pet ownership, and 21% reported interest in python pet ownership. However, contrary to our hypotheses, we found that viewing these species in different visual contexts did not significantly affect survey respondents' reported interest in having either species as a pet. Generation was a significant predictor of interest in both sloth and python pet ownership, with younger generations reporting more interest in having these species as pets. Male respondents reported more interest in python pet ownership, whereas there were no significant differences between genders regarding interest in sloth ownership. We consider how modern media exposure to animals in unnatural contexts may relate to the generational effect and discuss priorities for future research to better understand the development of individual interests in non-domesticated pet ownership.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAnimalsAnimals, DomesticCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOwnershipPetsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID35081132
PMCPMC8791465
OpenAlexW4210756109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.