Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35081129›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

In silico, in vitro and in vivo safety evaluation of Limosilactobacillus reuteri strains ATCC PTA-126787 & ATCC PTA-126788 for potential probiotic applications.

Dharanesh Gangaiah, Shrinivasrao P Mane, Nilesh R Tawari, Nallakannu Lakshmanan, Valerie Ryan, Alyssa Volland, Dwi Susanti, Milind Patel, Abraham Abouzeid, Emily B Helmes and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Preclinical Safety and Toxicological Assessment of Vitamin BMolecular nutrition & food research · 2026
    Article
  2. Frontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Draft genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2023
    Article
  5. Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Review
  6. Development and Applications of CRISPR/Cas9-Based Genome Editing inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dharanesh GangaiahElanco Animal Health, Greenfield, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1183-3078
Shrinivasrao P ManeElanco Animal Health, Greenfield, Indiana, United States of America.
Nilesh R TawariElanco Animal Health, Greenfield, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1127-0765
Nallakannu LakshmananElanco Animal Health, Greenfield, Indiana, United States of America.
Valerie RyanElanco Animal Health, Greenfield, Indiana, United States of America.
Alyssa VollandElanco Animal Health, Greenfield, Indiana, United States of America.
Dwi SusantiElanco Animal Health, Greenfield, Indiana, United States of America.
Milind PatelElanco Animal Health, Greenfield, Indiana, United States of America.
Abraham AbouzeidElanco Animal Health, Greenfield, Indiana, United States of America.
Emily B HelmesElanco Animal Health, Greenfield, Indiana, United States of America.
Arvind KumarElanco Animal Health, Greenfield, Indiana, United States of America.
Elanco (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The last two decades have witnessed a tremendous growth in probiotics and in the numbers of publications on their potential health benefits. Owing to their distinguishing beneficial effects and long history of safe use, species belonging to the Lactobacillus genus are among the most widely used probiotic species in human food and dietary supplements and are finding increased use in animal feed. Here, we isolated, identified, and evaluated the safety of two novel Limosilactobacillus reuteri (L. reuteri) isolates, ATCC PTA-126787 & ATCC PTA-126788. More specifically, we sequenced the genomes of these two L. reuteri strains using the PacBio sequencing platform. Using a combination of biochemical and genetic methods, we identified the two strains as belonging to L. reuteri species. Detailed in silico analyses showed that the two strains do not encode for any known genetic sequences of concern for human or animal health. In vitro assays confirmed that the strains are susceptible to clinically relevant antibiotics and do not produce potentially harmful by-products such as biogenic amines. In vitro bile and acid tolerance studies demonstrated that the two strains have similar survival profiles as the commercial L. reuteri probiotic strain DSM 17938. Most importantly, daily administration of the two probiotic strains to broiler chickens in drinking water for 26 days did not induce any adverse effect, clinical disease, or histopathological lesions, supporting the safety of the strains in an in vivo avian model. All together, these data provide in silico, in vitro and in vivo evidence of the safety of the two novel candidates for potential probiotic applications in humans as well as animals.

Indexed as

AnimalsChickensComputer SimulationIn Vitro TechniquesLimosilactobacillus reuteriProbiotics

Identifiers

PMID35081129
PMCPMC8791467
OpenAlexW4210599650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.