Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35080801›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2022

Age-specific survival rates, causes of death, and allowable take of golden eagles in the western United States.

Brian A Millsap, Guthrie S Zimmerman, William L Kendall, Joseph G Barnes, Melissa A Braham, Bryan E Bedrosian, Douglas A Bell, Peter H Bloom, Ross H Crandall, Robert Domenech and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Age-specific survival rates, causes of death, and allowable take of golden eagles in the western United States.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Systematic Map of Human-Raptor Interaction and Coexistence Research.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Brian A MillsapDivision of Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3969-249X
Guthrie S ZimmermanDivision of Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0965-2123
William L KendallU.S. Geological Survey, Colorado Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0084-9891
Joseph G BarnesWildlife Diversity Division, Nevada Department of Wildlife, Reno, Nevada, USA.
Melissa A BrahamConservation Science Global, Cape May, New Jersey, USA.
Bryan E BedrosianTeton Raptor Center, Wilson, Wyoming, USA.
Douglas A BellEast Bay Regional Park District and Department of Ornithology and Mammalogy, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, California, USA.
Peter H BloomBloom Biological Inc., Santa Ana, California, USA.
Ross H CrandallCraighead Beringia South, Kelly, Wyoming, USA.
Robert DomenechRaptor View Research Institute, Missoula, Montana, USA.
Daniel DriscollAmerican Eagle Research Institute, Apache Junction, Arizona, USA.
Adam E DuerrBloom Research Inc., Santa Ana, California, USA.
Rick GerhardtNorthwest Wildlife Consultants, Inc., Madras, Oregon, USA.
Samantha E J GibbsWildlife Health Office, Natural Resource Program Center, National Wildlife Refuge System, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Chiefland, Florida, USA.
Alan R HarmataEcology Department, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA.
Kenneth JacobsonArizona Game and Fish Department, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Todd E KatznerForest & Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Boise, Idaho, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4503-8435
Robert N KnightUnited States Army Dugway Proving Ground, Natural Resource Program, Dugway, Utah, USA.
J Michael LockhartWildlands Photography and Bio-Consulting, Laramie, Wyoming, USA.
Carol McIntyreNational Park Service, Denali National Park and Preserve, Fairbanks, Alaska, USA.
Robert K MurphyEagle Environmental, Inc., Sandia Park, New Mexico, USA.
Steven J SlaterHawkWatch International, Inc., Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Brian W SmithDivision of Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Lakewood, Colorado, USA.
Jeff P SmithH. T. Harvey & Associates, Los Gatos, California, USA.
Dale W StahleckerEagle Environmental, Inc., Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA.
James W WatsonWashington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Concrete, Washington, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the United States, the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act prohibits take of golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) unless authorized by permit, and stipulates that all permitted take must be sustainable. Golden eagles are unintentionally killed in conjunction with many lawful activities (e.g., electrocution on power poles, collision with wind turbines). Managers who issue permits for incidental take of golden eagles must determine allowable take levels and manage permitted take accordingly. To aid managers in making these decisions in the western United States, we used an integrated population model to obtain estimates of golden eagle vital rates and population size, and then used those estimates in a prescribed take level (PTL) model to estimate the allowable take level. Estimated mean annual survival rates for golden eagles ranged from 0.70 (95% credible interval = 0.66-0.74) for first-year birds to 0.90 (0.88-0.91) for adults. Models suggested a high proportion of adult female golden eagles attempted to breed and breeding pairs fledged a mean of 0.53 (0.39-0.72) young annually. Population size in the coterminous western United States has averaged ~31,800 individuals for several decades, with λ = 1.0 (0.96-1.05). The PTL model estimated a median allowable take limit of ~2227 (708-4182) individuals annually given a management objective of maintaining a stable population. We estimate that take averaged 2572 out of 4373 (59%) deaths annually, based on a representative sample of transmitter-tagged golden eagles. For the subset of golden eagles that were recovered and a cause of death determined, anthropogenic mortality accounted for an average of 74% of deaths after their first year; leading forms of take over all age classes were shooting (~670 per year), collisions (~611), electrocutions (~506), and poisoning (~427). Although observed take overlapped the credible interval of our allowable take estimate and the population overall has been stable, our findings indicate that additional take, unless mitigated for, may not be sustainable. Our analysis demonstrates the utility of the joint application of integrated population and prescribed take level models to management of incidental take of a protected species.

Indexed as

EaglesAge FactorsAnimalsCause of DeathFemaleHumansPropylaminesSulfidesSurvival RateUnited States1-(4-methylthiophenyl)-2-aminopropanePropylaminesSulfidesallowable takecause of deathgolden eagleharvest managementintegrated population modelprescribed take level modelsurvival probabilitywestern United States

Identifiers

PMID35080801
PMCPMC9286660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.