Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35080755›Full record

ReviewCurrent nutrition reports2022

Latest Trends in Investing for Improved Nutrition and Obesity Prevention.

Ella Robinson, Rachel Carey, Anita Foerster, Gary Sacks

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current nutrition reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Health in the age of asset manager capitalism.Health promotion international · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ella RobinsonGlobal Obesity Centre (GLOBE), Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia. ella.robinson@deakin.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-1960-0703
Rachel CareySchool of Agriculture and Food, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Anita FoersterMonash Business School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Gary SacksGlobal Obesity Centre (GLOBE), Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe aim of this paper is to summarise current trends and new developments with regard to institutional investor actions related to nutrition and obesity prevention. RECENT

findingsInvestor-related activity related to improving population diets is building, with several recent initiatives aiming to accelerate achievement of global nutrition goals. There is increasing civil society and investor activism focused on leveraging investor influence to improve nutrition-related food company actions. There are multiple sustainability-related reporting standards; however, few include comprehensive nutrition-related metrics. There is increasing interest from institutional investors in addressing nutrition-related issues; however, investor activity in the area is piece-meal. There is a need for further integration of nutrition within current reporting frameworks. Methodological alignment across the increasing number of food industry accountability initiatives would likely help galvanise increased investor action. Some jurisdictions are introducing relevant mandatory reporting requirements, which are likely to play a key role in enhancing transparency by the food industry and financial institutions.

Indexed as

Food IndustryNutrition PolicyDietHumansNutritional StatusObesityNutritionObesity preventionResponsible investmentSustainable finance

Identifiers

PMID35080755
PMCPMC8942889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.