Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35080633›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2022

Incident peptic ulcers and concomitant treatment of direct oral anticoagulants and oral bisphosphonates-a real-world cohort study.

J Starup-Linde, B Langdahl, P Vestergaard, T Harsløf

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J Starup-LindeDepartment of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus, Denmark. jakolind@rm.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4325-8023
B LangdahlDepartment of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus, Denmark.
P VestergaardDepartment of Endocrinology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
T HarsløfDepartment of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus, Denmark.
Aarhus University Hospital · DKAalborg University Hospital · DK

Funding

Novo Nordisk Fonden NNF18OC0052064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral bisphosphonates and direct oral anticoagulants are related to upper gastrointestinal ulcers. The present study investigated whether concomitant use of these drugs increase the risk of upper gastrointestinal ulcers and report no increased risk of upper gastrointestinal ulcers compared to the use of either drug alone, when individuals with previous upper gastrointestinal ulcers are excluded.

introductionThis study examines whether concomitant use of oral bisphosphonates (oBP) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) increases the risk of peptic ulcers more than any drug alone.

methodsA population-based cohort study was performed. We sampled a cohort of oBP and DOAC users from a sample of 2,622,742 individuals, consisting of diabetes patients and age- and gender-matched controls, obtained from the Danish National Patient Register. The exposures were concomitant use of oBP and DOAC and single use of DOAC and single use of oBP. The primary endpoint was the first incident peptic ulcer. Information on exposure and outcome were collected from national registries. The period of observation was from 01.01.2008 until 31.12.2018. Unadjusted and adjusted Cox regressions were performed.

results8077 individuals received concomitant treatment with DOAC and oBP; 96,451 individuals used DOAC and no oBP; and 118,675 used oBP and no DOAC. The mean duration of follow-up was 1.9 years for concomitant users, 2.5 years for DOAC users, and 4.5 years for oBP users. A total of 4742 individuals with incident peptic ulcers were collected. We observed an increased risk of incident ulcer in users of DOAC and oBP compared to single DOAC treatment in the adjusted analysis (HR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.03; 1.48). However, the effects were abolished when excluding individuals with a previous ulcer. We observed an increased risk of incident ulcer in users of DOAC and oBP compared to users of oBP in the adjusted model (HR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.11; 1.63).

conclusionBased on our results, concomitant use of oBP and DOAC is associated with a slight increase in the risk of peptic ulcers compared to either drug alone. The prescribing physician should weigh the slight increased risk of ulcer in concomitant users of oBP and DOAC with beneficial reductions in stroke and fractures.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal DiseasesPeptic UlcerAnticoagulantsCohort StudiesDiphosphonatesHumansUlcerAnticoagulantsDiphosphonatesBisphosphonatesDirect oral anticoagulantsPeptic ulcerProton pump inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID35080633
OpenAlexW4210528799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.