Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35080632›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2022

Patient preferences for lifestyle behaviours in osteoporotic fracture prevention: a cross-European discrete choice experiment.

C Beaudart, A Boonen, N Li, S Bours, S Goemaere, J-Y Reginster, C Roux, B McGowan, A Diez-Perez, R Rizzoli and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 9 countries.

C BeaudartDepartment of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands. c.beaudart@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0827-5303
A BoonenDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, and CAPRHI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
N LiDepartment of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
S BoursDepartment of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
S GoemaereDepartment of Rheumatology and Endocrinology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
J-Y ReginsterWHO Collaborating Center for Public Health Aspects of Musculo-Skeletal Health and Ageing, Division of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
C RouxDepartment of Rheumatology, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.
B McGowanThe North Western Rheumatology Unit, Our Lady's Hospital, Manorhamilton, Co. Leitrim, Ireland.
A Diez-PerezMusculoskeletal Research Unit (IMIM) and CIBERFES, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
R RizzoliDivision of Bone Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
C CooperMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK.
M HiligsmannDepartment of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NLDélégation Paris 5 · FRGhent University Hospital · BEOur Lady's Hospital · IESouthampton General Hospital · GBUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CHUniversity of Liège · BE

Funding

Medical Research Council G0400491Medical Research Council G0601019Medical Research Council MC_PC_21000Medical Research Council MC_PC_21001Medical Research Council MC_PC_21003Medical Research Council MC_PC_21022Medical Research Council MC_U147585819Medical Research Council MC_U147585824Medical Research Council MC_U147585827Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1014Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1015Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/2Medical Research Council MR/J000094/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using a discrete choice experiment, we aimed to assess patients' preferences with regard to adopting lifestyle behaviours to prevent osteoporotic fractures. Overall, the 1042 patients recruited from seven European countries were favourable to some lifestyle behaviours (i.e., engaging in moderate physical activity, taking calcium and vitamin D supplements, reducing their alcohol consumption and ensuring a normal body weight).

introductionAlongside medical therapy, healthy lifestyle habits are recommended for preventing osteoporotic fractures. In this study, we aimed to assess patients' preferences with regard to adopting lifestyle changes to prevent osteoporotic fractures.

methodsA discrete choice experiment was conducted in seven European countries. Patients with or at risk of osteoporosis were asked to indicate to what extent they would be motivated to adhere to 16 lifestyle packages that differed in various levels of 6 attributes. The attributes and levels proposed were physical activity (levels: not included, moderate or high), calcium and vitamin D status (levels: not included, taking supplements, improving nutrition and assuring a minimal exposure to sunlight daily), smoking (levels: not included, quit smoking), alcohol (levels: not included, moderate consumption), weight reduction (levels: not included, ensure a healthy body weight) and fall prevention (levels: not included, receiving general advice or following a 1-day fall prevention program). A conditional logit model was used to estimate a patient's relative preferences for the various attributes across all participants and per country.

resultsIn total, 1042 patients completed the questionnaire. Overall, patients were favourable to lifestyle behaviours for preventing osteoporotic fractures. However, among the lifestyle behaviours proposed, patients were consensually not prone to engage in a high level of physical activity. In addition, in Ireland, Belgium, the Netherlands and Switzerland, patients were also not inclined to participate in a 1-day fall prevention program and Belgian, Swiss and Dutch patients were not prone to adhere to a well-balanced nutritional program. Nevertheless, we observed globally that patients felt positively about reducing their alcohol consumption, engaging in moderate physical activity, taking calcium and vitamin D supplements and ensuring a normal body weight, all measures aimed at preventing fractures.

conclusionsIn a patient-centred approach, fracture prevention should take these considerations and preferences into account.

Indexed as

Osteoporotic FracturesCalciumCalcium, DietaryHumansLife StylePatient PreferenceVitamin DCalciumCalcium, DietaryVitamin DDiscrete choice experimentFracturesLifestyleOsteoporosisPatients’ preferences

Identifiers

PMID35080632
PMCPMC9106627
OpenAlexW4210666627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.