Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35080504›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2022

A Novel Peer-to-Peer Coaching Program to Support Digital Mental Health: Design and Implementation.

Benjamin M Rosenberg, Tamar Kodish, Zachary D Cohen, Elizabeth Gong-Guy, Michelle G Craske

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Adaptation of a fidelity monitoring tool for online delivery of the Family Check-Up.Journal of educational and psychological consultation : the official journal of the Association for Educational and Psychological Consultants · 2026
    Article
  7. Anxiety and depression in emerging adults: The STAND program as a model of scalable screening and intervention.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Benjamin M Rosenberg *Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5346-6889
Tamar Kodish *Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6679-5841
Zachary D CohenDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4883-1028
Elizabeth Gong-GuySemel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7705-8655
Michelle G CraskeDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3704-5240
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many individuals in need of mental health services do not currently receive care. Scalable programs are needed to reduce the burden of mental illness among those without access to existing providers. Digital interventions present an avenue for increasing the reach of mental health services. These interventions often rely on paraprofessionals, or coaches, to support the treatment. Although existing programs hold immense promise, providers must ensure that treatments are delivered with high fidelity and adherence to the treatment model. In this paper, we first highlight the tension between the scalability and fidelity of mental health services. We then describe the design and implementation of a peer-to-peer coach training program to support a digital mental health intervention for undergraduate students within a university setting. We specifically note strategies for emphasizing fidelity within our scalable framework, including principles of learning theory and competency-based supervision. Finally, we discuss future applications of this work, including the potential adaptability of our model for use within other contexts.

Indexed as

college studentsdigital mental healthpeer supportscalable psychological interventionstraining and supervisionuniversity students

Identifiers

PMID35080504
PMCPMC8829693
OpenAlexW3214891338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.