Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35080495›Full record

ArticleJMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies2022

A Novel Body Weight-Supported Postural Perturbation Module for Gait and Balance Rehabilitation After Stroke: Preliminary Evaluation Study.

Amanda Meyer, Henry Charles Hrdlicka, Erica Cutler, Jill Hellstrand, Emily Meise, Kaitlyn Rudolf, Pete Grevelding, Matthew Nankin

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04919161 nacompletednot on this map

Unblinded Quasi-Randomized Pilot Study Exploring the Benefits of the ZeroG TRiP System to Improve Patient Balance Following an Acute Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorGaylord Hospital, IncRan2019 to 2020Enrolled32ConditionsStroke, Balance, DistortedArmsBody weight support system control group, Body weight support system with balance perturbations
NCT05110300 naterminatednot on this map

Clinical Study of a Novel, Body-weight Supported, Balance-perturbation Module During the Rehabilitation of Gait and Balance Impairments Secondary to Stroke: A Multisite Randomized Control Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorGaylord Hospital, IncRan2021 to 2023Enrolled114ConditionsStroke, Stroke, Acute, Balance, DistortedArmsBody weight support system control group, Body weight support system with balance perturbations
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amanda MeyerDepartment of Inpatient Occupational Therapy, Gaylord Specialty Healthcare, Wallingford, CT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9878-8040
Henry Charles HrdlickaMilne Institute for Healthcare Innovation, Gaylord Specialty Healthcare, Wallingford, CT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7014-7919
Erica CutlerDepartment of Inpatient Physical Therapy, Gaylord Specialty Healthcare, Wallingford, CT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2103-0017
Jill HellstrandDepartment of Inpatient Physical Therapy, Gaylord Specialty Healthcare, Wallingford, CT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8306-5912
Emily MeiseDepartment of Inpatient Occupational Therapy, Gaylord Specialty Healthcare, Wallingford, CT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7177-8766
Kaitlyn RudolfDepartment of Inpatient Physical Therapy, Gaylord Specialty Healthcare, Wallingford, CT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6253-2940
Pete GreveldingMilne Institute for Healthcare Innovation, Gaylord Specialty Healthcare, Wallingford, CT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7734-3608
Matthew NankinFrank H Netter MD School of Medicine, Quinnipiac University, North Haven, CT, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6478-2046
Gaylord Hospital · USQuinnipiac University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImpaired balance regulation after stroke puts patients and therapists at risk of injury during rehabilitation. Body weight support systems (BWSSs) minimize this risk and allow patients to safely practice balance activities during therapy. Treadmill-based balance perturbation systems with BWSSs are known to improve balance in patients with age- or disease-related impairments. However, these stationary systems are unable to accommodate complex exercises that require more freedom of movement.

objectiveThis study aims to evaluate the effect of a new balance perturbation module, which is directly integrated into a track-mounted BWSS, on balance impairments secondary to acute stroke.

methodsThis unblinded quasi-randomized controlled preliminary study was conducted in a rehabilitation-focused long-term acute care hospital. Participants were recruited from stroke rehabilitation inpatients with an admission Berg Balance Scale (BBS) score of 21 (out of 56) or greater. Over a 2-week period, consented participants completed 8 BWSS or BWSS with perturbation (BWSS-P) treatment sessions; study activities were incorporated into regular treatment to avoid disruption of their normal care. Although both groups conducted the same balance and gait activities during their treatment sessions, the BWSS-P sessions included lateral, anterior, and posterior balance perturbations. Pre- and postintervention BBS and Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) assessments were the primary outcome measures collected. Institutional BBS data from the year before installation of the track-mounted BWSS were retrospectively included as a post hoc historical standard of care comparison.

resultsThe improved postintervention BBS and ABC assessment scores showed that all participants benefited from therapy (P<.001 for all pre- and postintervention comparisons). The average BBS percent change for the BWSS-P sample (n=14) was 66.95% (SD 43.78%) and that for the BWSS control sample (n=15) was 53.29% (SD 24.13%). These values were greater than those for the standard of care group (n=30; mean 28.31%, SD 17.25%; P=.02 and P=.005 respectively), with no difference among the BWSS groups (P=.67). ABC score changes were also similar among the preintervention and postintervention BWSS groups (P=.94 and P=.92, respectively).

conclusionsBoth BWSS groups demonstrated similar BBS and ABC score improvements, indicating that balance perturbations were not detrimental to postacute stroke rehabilitation and were safe to use. These data provide strong rationale and baseline data for conducting a larger follow-up study to further assess if this new perturbation system provides additional benefit to the rehabilitation of gait and balance impairments following stroke.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04919161; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04919161.

Indexed as

Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scalebalance perturbationbody weight support systemgait and ambulationlong-term acute care hospital, Berg Balance Scaleoccupational therapyphysical therapypostural balancepostural perturbationstroke rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID35080495
PMCPMC8924779
OpenAlexW4210703278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.