ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2022
Oculomotor freezing indicates conscious detection free of decision bias.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Type-1 and type-2 decisions feature computational noise of similar magnitude.Communications psychology · 2026Article
- Rapid Motor Inhibition as a Mechanism to Prevent Outdated Movements.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
- Cortical evidence accumulation for visual perception occurs irrespective of reports.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Sleuthing subjectivity: a review of covert measures of consciousness.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2025Review
- Distinct modulation of microsaccades in motor planning and covert attention.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Predictions and rewards affect decision-making but not subjective experience.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The appearance of a salient stimulus rapidly and automatically inhibits saccadic eye movements. Curiously, this "oculomotor freezing" response is triggered only by stimuli that the observer reports seeing. It remains unknown, however, whether oculomotor freezing is linked to the observer's sensory experience or their decision that a stimulus was present. To dissociate between these possibilities, we manipulated decision criterion via monetary payoffs and stimulus probability in a detection task. These manipulations greatly shifted observers' decision criteria but did not affect the degree to which microsaccades were inhibited by stimulus presence. Moreover, the link between oculomotor freezing and explicit reports of stimulus presence was stronger when the criterion was conservative rather than liberal. We conclude that the sensory threshold for oculomotor freezing is independent of decision bias. Provided that conscious experience is also unaffected by such bias, oculomotor freezing is an implicit indicator of sensory awareness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.