Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35080160›Full record

ArticleSe pu = Chinese journal of chromatography2022

[Dispersive solid-phase extraction combined with high-performance liquid chromatography for determination of seven anesthetics in aquatic products].

Fang Shi, Dan Shou, Micong Jin, Hongwei Wang, Xuguang Chen, Yan Zhu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Fang ShiDepartment of Chemistry, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310028, China.
Dan ShouDepartment of Medicine, Zhejiang Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou 310007, China.
Micong JinNingbo Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Ningbo 315010, China;6. Key Laboratory of Health Risk Appraisal for Trace Toxic Chemicals of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310028, China.
Hongwei WangTongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 310012, China.
Xuguang ChenZhejiang Metallurgical Research Institute Co., LTD., Hangzhou 310007, China.
Yan ZhuDepartment of Chemistry, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310028, China;6. Key Laboratory of Health Risk Appraisal for Trace Toxic Chemicals of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310028, China.
Zhejiang University · CNTongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province · CNZhejiang Metallurgical Research Institute · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nowadays, anesthetics are widely used in fishery production processes, such as fish breeding, surgery, and fresh aquatic product transportation. Because of the widespread application of anesthetic drugs in aquatic products, there is an increasing demand for the rapid and sensitive detection of anesthetic drugs in aquatic products. The complex aquatic product matrix contains a variety of interfering substances, such as proteins, fats, and phospholipids, along with anesthetic drug residues at very low concentrations; therefore, it is necessary to adopt appropriate pretreatment methods for improving the sensitivity of detection. In this study, a dispersive solid-phase extraction (DSPE) method, combined with high-performance liquid chromatography, was established for the simultaneous detection of seven anesthetic drugs in aquatic products, viz. procaine, oxybuprocaine, tricaine, eugenol, methyl eugenol, isoeugenol, and methyl isoeugenol. For the DSPE step, pretreatment conditions, such as extraction solvent, extraction time, adsorbent amount, and DMSO dosage, were optimized. Sample pretreatment is a three-step process. First, in ultrasound-assisted extraction, 2.0 g samples were extracted using 10.0 mL 1.0% formic acid in acetonitrile under ultrasound conditions for 10 min. Then, DSPE was performed with mixed adsorbents: the solvent extracts were cleaned using 20 mg poly(styrene-glycidylmethacrylate) microspheres (PS-GMA), 50 mg primary secondary amines (PSA), and 10 mg C18, followed by separation by centrifugation. Finally, DMSO-assisted concentration was applied: the organic layer was collected and was dried at 40 ℃ in a N

Indexed as

AnestheticsDrug ResiduesAnimalsChromatography, High Pressure LiquidSolid Phase ExtractionTandem Mass SpectrometryAnestheticsanesthetic drugsaquatic productsdispersive solid-phase extraction (DSPE)high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)

Identifiers

PMID35080160
PMCPMC9404131
OpenAlexW4210504528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.