ArticleAustralian veterinary journal2022
Update on feline alphaherpesvirus-1 seroprevalence in Victorian feral and owned cats.
Article in Australian veterinary journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tracing feline herpesvirus-1 exposure in domestic cats from Namibia: associations with neutralising antibodies, vaccination, clinical signs, and retroviral status.Veterinary research communications · 2026Article
- Host-specificity assessment of feline alphaherpesvirus-1 derived immunocontraceptive candidates in non-feline models.Virology journal · 2026Article
- Update on feline alphaherpesvirus-1 seroprevalence in Victorian feral and owned cats.Australian veterinary journal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCORRIGENDUM.2022
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The seroprevalence of feline alphaherpesvirus-1 (FHV-1) in feral cats in Victoria, Australia, was last assessed in 1981 when serum-virus-neutralising antibodies (VNAb) against FHV-1 were detected in 11% of the sampled population from two Victorian locations. In this current study, VNAb were assessed in serum from feral cats located in Phillip Island, Point Cook and Hattah in the Mallee region in Northern Victoria. In feral cats, the seroprevalence of VNAb to FHV-1 was highest in Point Cook at 24.6% (17/69), followed by Phillip Island at 16.7% (11/66) and Hattah where no feral cats had detectable VNAb to FHV-1 (0/12). In contrast, virus-neutralising antibodies were observed in 84.1% (37/44) of Victorian-owned cats. This higher seroprevalence in owned cats is likely due to the use of FHV-1 vaccines; however, the vaccination history of the cats was not known and the development of neutralising antibodies after infection or vaccination can vary. The results are useful for understanding FHV-1 exposure in feral and owned cats and are important background information in the context of any potential future use of FHV-1-vectored vaccines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.