Trial reportInternational ophthalmology2022
Intraocular pressure outcomes after 23-G vitreoretinal surgery with two different transconjunctival sutureless sclerotomy techniques: vertical versus tunnel entry.
Trial report in International ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- A sutureless technique for securing leaking sclerotomies with viscoelastic substances in 23-gauge microincision vitrectomy surgery.International journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeComparison of postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) course and early complications in 23-gauge (23-G) pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) using vertical entry sclerotomy and scleral tunnel sclerotomy in uncomplicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).
methodA prospective, randomized, comparative, interventional clinical trial of 103 23-G vitrectomy cases using two different transconjunctival sutureless sclerotomy techniques performed by a single vitreoretinal surgeon for uncomplicated RRD. Fifty-two eyes underwent PPV using a three-port 23-G single stage, vertical trocar entry without creating a scleral tunnel (Group 1), while in 51 eyes, a two-stage, oblique trocar entry with creation of a scleral tunnel was performed (Group 2). Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) gas (20%) was used in all cases as a buffer. Intraocular pressure measurements and detailed biomicroscopic examination of the groups were recorded on the postoperative first day, first week, and first month. Visual acuity and fundoscopic examinations were recorded at one month. The effects of the two methods on postoperative intraocular pressure and early complications were compared.
resultsThere was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age and gender (p > 0.05). The mean postoperative intraocular pressure on the first day was 15.06 ± 3.71 for Group 1 and 16.14 ± 3.09 mmHg for Group 2. The lowest recorded IOP was 6 mmHg. Postoperative visual acuity did not differ between the two groups (p > 0.05). In addition, IOP values did not differ statistically between the two groups (p > 0.05). In both groups, the mean IOP values measured at different intervals did not differ statistically (p > 0.05).
conclusionThere was no significant difference in terms of postoperative IOP between vertical entry 23-G sclerotomy and 23-G tunnel entry sclerotomy for PPV with 20% SF6 tamponade surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.