Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35079905›Full record

SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022

Hope therapy in cancer patients: a systematic review.

Hamed Salimi, Haniyeh Bashi Zadeh Fakhar, Mohammad Hadizadeh, MohammadEsmaeil Akbari, Neda Izadi, Reza MohamadiRad, Hosna Akbari, Ramtin Hoseini

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Hope and its associated factors in cancer patients undergoing drug therapy: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hamed SalimiDepartment of DBA, Oxford University, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6854-4168
Haniyeh Bashi Zadeh FakharCancer Research Centre (CRC), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Haniyehfakhar@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0396-461X
Mohammad HadizadehCancer Research Centre (CRC), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8168-6750
MohammadEsmaeil AkbariCancer Research Centre (CRC), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9938-3587
Neda IzadiCancer Research Center, Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Reza MohamadiRadDepartment of Psychology, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran.
Hosna AkbariCancer Research Centre (CRC), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ramtin HoseiniChalous Branch, Islamic Azad University, Chalous, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo identify the associated factors of hope therapy during treatment in cancer patients.

backgroundHope is very important to cancer patients at all stages of the disease process. Several and different factors are associated with hope.

designA systematic literature review of quantitative empirical studies on hope and quality of life in cancer patients. DATA SOURCES: Search in MEDLINE, Psychinfo, and Cochrane (January 2010-December 2020). REVIEW

methodsA coherent search strategy was designed where MESH terms were combined with "free text" terms: hope (e.g., hope therapy, Herth Hope Index, quality of life) and cancer (e.g. neoplasm, tumor). Two authors independently screened all the studies and assessed their quality.

resultsTwenty studies were included. The overall score of Herth Hope Index in cancer patients was 36.93, and the overall score of quality of life in cancer patients were 47.52. Also, the trend of quality of life and Herth Hope Index in cancer patients has been decreasing, from 2010 to 2020.

conclusionsThis systematic literature review of associated factors of hope in cancer patients receiving treatment shows that hope seems to be positively related mainly by intrinsic factors, such as perceived health, quality of life, and social support.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsText MessagingHumansQuality of LifeSocial SupportA systematic reviewCancer patientsHope therapy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.