Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35079809›Full record

ArticleHospital pediatrics2022

Caregiver Inclusivity and Empowerment During Family-Centered Rounds.

Victoria Parente, Ashley Stark, Mikelle Key-Solle, Maren Olsen, Linda L Sanders, Kathleen W Bartlett, Kathryn I Pollak

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hospital pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05618652 (Development and Pilot Testing of an Equity-focused and Trauma-informed Communication Intervention During Family-centered Rounds), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05618652 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Development and Pilot Testing of an Equity-focused and Trauma-informed Communication Intervention During Family-centered Rounds

TypeinterventionalSponsorDuke UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled51ConditionsHospitalism in Children, Post Traumatic Stress DisorderArmsEquity Focused and Trauma-Informed Communication Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Victoria ParenteDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina.
Ashley StarkDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina.
Mikelle Key-SolleDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina.
Maren OlsenDepartments of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics.
Linda L SandersDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina.
Kathleen W BartlettDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina.
Kathryn I PollakPopulation Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Duke University Hospital · USDuke Cancer InstituteDurham VA Health Care System · US

Funding

Research Project 3U54MD012530 · NIMHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNSON, KIMBERLY S. · 2017 to 2022
$8.8M
Duke Center for Advancement of Child Health (CAtCH)K12HD105253 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Corinne Mary Linardic, Ann M. Reed · 2021 to 2026
$1.5M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD105253NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD012530
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDespite widespread adoption of family-centered rounds, few have investigated differences in the experience of family-centered rounds by family race and ethnicity. The purpose of this study was to explore racial and ethnic differences in caregiver perception of inclusion and empowerment during family-centered rounds.

methodsWe identified eligible caregivers of children admitted to the general pediatrics team through the electronic health record. Surveys were completed by 99 caregivers (47 non-Latinx White and 52 Black, Latinx, or other caregivers of color). To compare agreement with statements of inclusivity and empowerment, we used the Wilcoxon rank sum test in unadjusted analyses and linear regression for the adjusted analyses.

resultsMost (91%) caregivers were satisfied or extremely satisfied with family-centered rounds. We found no differences by race or ethnicity in statements of satisfaction or understanding family-centered rounds content. However, in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses, we found that White caregivers more strongly agreed with the statements "I felt comfortable participating in rounds," "I had adequate time to ask questions during rounds," and "I felt a valued member of the team during rounds" compared with Black, Latinx, and other caregivers of color.

conclusionsCongruent with studies of communication in other settings, caregivers of color may experience barriers to inclusion in family-centered rounds, such as medical team bias, less empathic communication, and shorter encounters. Future studies are needed to better understand family-centered rounds disparities and develop interventions that promote inclusive rounds.

Indexed as

CaregiversTeaching RoundsChildCommunicationEmpathyHumansSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID35079809
PMCPMC9881425
OpenAlexW4210793959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.