Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35079751›Full record

ArticleVirtual, augmented and mixed reality : 13th International Conference, VAMR 2021, held as part of the 23rd HCI International Conference, HCII 2021, Virtual event, July 24-29, 2021, Proceedings. VAMR (Conference) (13th : 2021 : Online)2021

Design Considerations for Interacting and Navigating with 2 Dimensional and 3 Dimensional Medical Images in Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality Medical Applications.

Jennifer N Avari Silva, Michael K Southworth, Christopher M Andrews, Mary Beth Privitera, Alexander B Henry, Jonathan R Silva

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virtual, augmented and mixed reality : 13th International Conference, VAMR 2021, held as part of the 23rd HCI International Conference, HCII 2021, Virtual event, July 24-29, 2021, Proceedings. VAMR (Conference) (13th : 2021 : Online), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. HoloLensTherapeutic advances in urology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jennifer N Avari SilvaDepartment of Pediatrics, Cardiology, Washington University in St Louis, School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
Michael K SouthworthSentiAR, Inc, St Louis, MO, USA.
Christopher M AndrewsSentiAR, Inc, St Louis, MO, USA.
Mary Beth PriviteraHS Design, Gladstone, NJ, USA.
Alexander B HenrySentiAR, Inc, St Louis, MO, USA.
Jonathan R SilvaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St Louis, McKelvey School of Engineering, St Louis, MO, USA.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Using Augmented Reality To Make Cardiac Ablation Procedures Simpler and SaferR44HL140896 · NHLBI · SENTIAR, INC. · PI SILVA, JENNIFER N, SILVA, JONATHAN R · 2018 to 2019
$2.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R44 HL140896
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extended realities, including virtual, augmented, and mixed realities (VAMR) have recently experienced significant hardware improvement resulting in an expansion in medical applications. These applications can be classified by the target end user (for instance, classifying applications as patient-centric, physician-centric, or both) or by use case (for instance educational, diagnostic tools, therapeutic tools, or some combination). When developing medical applications in VAMR, careful consideration of both the target end user and use case must heavily influence design considerations, particularly methods and tools for interaction and navigation. Medical imaging consists of both 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional medical imaging which impacts design, interaction, and navigation. Additionally, medical applications need to comply with regulatory considerations which will also influence interaction and design considerations. In this manuscript, the authors explore these considerations using three VAMR tools being developed for cardiac electrophysiology procedures.

Indexed as

Cardiac electrophysiologyExtended realityMedical applicationsMedical deviceMixed realityUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID35079751
PMCPMC8786214
OpenAlexW3186110684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.