ArticleATS scholar2021
Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Model Global Learning Framework.
Article in ATS scholar, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of thoracoscopic segmental lung resection versus wedge on early post-operative recovery and short-term prognosis in elderly patients with early non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective non-randomised controlled cohort study.Journal of minimal access surgery · 2026Article
- Advantages of negative-pressure suction device compared to traditional chest closed drainage in the management of patients after mediastinal mass resection.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- A new vessel filled and heart-beating human corpse model for VATS lobectomy training.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Patients Undergoing Elective Thoracotomy Versus Thoracoscopic Surgeries.Cureus · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVideo-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is a minimally invasive approach for the treatment of lung cancer and other lung diseases. Although VATS is associated with better outcomes compared with open surgery, the extensive skill and knowledge requirements may prolong the learning curve and limit adoption.
objectiveThe objective of this work was to develop a training model that optimizes skill acquisition while shortening the learning curve of novel surgical procedures, with a specific application to VATS training.
methodsA seven-step training method was developed. A board of thoracic surgeons was then surveyed by a Delphi process to validate the method within the context of a VATS curriculum.
resultsThe Delphi consensus established the following:
conclusionThis paper presents the educational components that are needed to form a standardized curriculum for VATS, as agreed by a panel of established thoracic surgeons through a Delphi process. The training framework considers both individual and team-specific skills along the learning curve to optimize outcomes for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.