Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35079642›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2022

Radiomics biopsy signature for predicting survival in patients with spinal bone metastases (SBMs).

I Sanli, B Osong, A Dekker, K TerHaag, S M J van Kuijk, J van Soest, L Wee, P C Willems

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Radiomics in spinal research: a narrative review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Radiomics in Spine Surgery.International journal of spine surgery · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

I SanliDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands.
B OsongDepartment of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands.
A DekkerDepartment of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands.
K TerHaagDepartment of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands.
S M J van KuijkDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
J van SoestDepartment of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands.
L WeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands.
P C WillemsDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands.
Maastro Clinic · NLMaastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designRetrospective analysis of a registered cohort of patients treated and irradiated for metastases in the spinal column in a single institute.

objectiveThis is the first study to develop and internally validate radiomics features for predicting six-month survival probability for patients with spinal bone metastases (SBM). BACKGROUND DATA: Extracted radiomics features from routine clinical CT images can be used to identify textural and intensity-based features unperceivable to human observers and associate them with a patient survival probability or disease progression.

methodsA study was conducted on 250 patients treated for metastases in the spinal column irradiated for the first time between 2014 and 2016, at the MAASTRO clinic in Maastricht, the Netherlands. The first 150 available patients were used to develop the model and the subsequent 100 patient were considered as a test set for the model. A bootstrap (B = 400) stepwise model selection, which combines both the forward and backward variable elimination procedure, was used to select the most useful predictive features from the training data based on the Akaike information criterion (AIC). The stepwise selection procedure was applied to the 400 bootstrap samples, and the results were plotted as a histogram to visualize how often each variable was selected. Only variables selected more than 90 % of the time over the bootstrap runs were used to build the final model.A prognostic index (PI) called radiomics score (radscore) and clinical score (clinscore) was calculated for each patient. The prognostic index was not scaled, the original values were used which can be extracted from the model directly or calculated as a linear combination of the variables in the model multiplied by the respective beta value for each patient.

resultsThe clinical model had a good discrimination power. The radiomics model, on the other hand, had an inferior performance with no added predictive power to the clinical model. The internal imaging characteristics do not seem to have a value in the prediction of survival. However, the Shape features were excluded from further analyses in our study since all biopsies had a standard shape hence no variability.

Indexed as

Predictive modelRadiomicsSBMSpinal bone metastases

Identifiers

PMID35079642
PMCPMC8777154
OpenAlexW4205237641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.