Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35079615›Full record

ArticleData in brief2022

Description of movement sensor dataset for dog behavior classification.

Antti Vehkaoja, Sanni Somppi, Heini Törnqvist, Anna Valldeoriola Cardó, Pekka Kumpulainen, Heli Väätäjä, Päivi Majaranta, Veikko Surakka, Miiamaaria V Kujala, Outi Vainio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Antti VehkaojaFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, P.O. Box 692, Tampere FI-33101, Finland.
Sanni SomppiDepartment of Equine and Small Animal Medicine, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 57, Helsinki FI-00014, Finland.
Heini TörnqvistDepartment of Equine and Small Animal Medicine, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 57, Helsinki FI-00014, Finland.
Anna Valldeoriola CardóDepartment of Equine and Small Animal Medicine, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 57, Helsinki FI-00014, Finland.
Pekka KumpulainenFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, P.O. Box 692, Tampere FI-33101, Finland.
Heli VäätäjäResearch Group for Emotions, Sociality, and Computing, Faculty of Information Technology and Communication Sciences, Tampere University, P.O. Box 100, Tampere FI-33014, Finland.
Päivi MajarantaResearch Group for Emotions, Sociality, and Computing, Faculty of Information Technology and Communication Sciences, Tampere University, P.O. Box 100, Tampere FI-33014, Finland.
Veikko SurakkaResearch Group for Emotions, Sociality, and Computing, Faculty of Information Technology and Communication Sciences, Tampere University, P.O. Box 100, Tampere FI-33014, Finland.
Miiamaaria V KujalaDepartment of Equine and Small Animal Medicine, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 57, Helsinki FI-00014, Finland.
Outi VainioDepartment of Equine and Small Animal Medicine, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 57, Helsinki FI-00014, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Movement sensor data from seven static and dynamic dog behaviors (sitting, standing, lying down, trotting, walking, playing, and (treat) searching i.e. sniffing) was collected from 45 middle to large sized dogs with six degree-of-freedom movement sensors attached to the collar and the harness. With 17 dogs the collection procedure was repeated. The duration of each of the seven behaviors was approximately three minutes. The order of the tasks was varied between the dogs and the two repetitions (for the 17 dogs). The behaviors were annotated post-hoc based on the video recordings made with two camcorders during the tests with one second resolution. The annotations were accurately synchronized with the raw movement sensors data. The annotated data was originally used for training behavior classification machine learning algorithms for classifying the seven behaviors. The developed signal processing and classification algorithms are provided together with the raw measurement data and reference annotations. The description and results of the original investigation that the dataset relates to are found in: P. Kumpulainen, A. Valldeoriola Cardó, S. Somppi, H. Törnqvist, H. Väätäjä, P. Majaranta, Y. Gizatdinova, C. Hoog Antink, V. Surakka, M. V. Kujala, O. Vainio, A. Vehkaoja, Dog behavior classification with movement sensors placed on the harness and the collar, Applied Animal behavior Science, 241 (2021), 105,393.

Indexed as

AccelerometerBehavior classificationDog activity classificationGyroscopeMachine learningMovement sensor

Identifiers

PMID35079615
PMCPMC8777071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.