ArticleInternational journal of nursing sciences2022
Attitude of nursing students towards Internet-based nursing services for the aged.
Article in International journal of nursing sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Attitudes of nursing students toward older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Protocol for a scoping review of older informal carers and digital health service use.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Nurses' perceptions of engaging in internet-based nursing services: A qualitative study based on three hospitals in China.Nursing open · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the attitude, willingness, and motivation of third-year undergraduate nursing students from a university of Chinese medicine toward Internet
methodsThis study was conducted from March to April 2019. Using a self-designed questionnaire, this cross-sectional study comprised 508 third-year undergraduate nursing students from a university of Chinese medicine. The questionnaire was divided into two parts. The first part contained the general information of nursing students. The second part investigated nursing students' attitudes, willingness, and motivation towards IBNSA (a total of seven questions).
resultsOf the 508 nursing students, 314 (61.81%) expressed support for the IBNSA, 44(8.66%) expressed disapproval. Regarding career choice, 279 (54.92%) were willing to choose IBNSA, 51 (10.04%) were unwilling. The top three motivations for choosing IBNSA as a nursing student career were increased income, high autonomy and flexibility, and good job prospects. On the contrary, the top three reasons not to choose this option were safety concerns, lack of time and energy, and unwillingness to undertake elderly care. Experience with community activities or a part-time job, experience with elderly care, willing to choose the nursing profession, willing to engage in nursing care after graduation, and willing to engage in nursing for elderly patients after graduation were significantly associated with the motivation of nursing students to participate in IBNSA (
conclusionThe majority of nursing students have a positive attitude towards IBNSA and are willing to choose it as their future career. Nurses' and patients' safety guarantees and salary distribution were critical factors influencing their choice. Nursing schools should pay attention to the concerns of nursing students, constantly improve the management system of IBNSA, strengthen safety education, and provide professional knowledge and skills to improve the quality of personnel training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.