ArticleInternational journal of nursing sciences2022
The decision for hospice care in patients with terminal illness in Shanghai: A mixed-method study.
Article in International journal of nursing sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bereaved informal caregivers' experiences with a Canadian home hospice program: a qualitative study.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Knowledge attitudes and practices regarding MRI safety among healthcare providers and patients/family members in China.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Exercise Attitudes Mediate the Impact of Mental Health on Physical Activity Practices Among Chinese College Students: A Cross-Sectional Study in Chongqing.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Chronic Prostatitis Patients Regarding Electrophysiological Therapy in a Chinese Tertiary Hospital: A Cross-Sectional SEM Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- Construction of Outcome Quality Evaluation Indicators for Home Hospice Care in Older Patients with Terminal Cancer in China: A Delphi Study.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Article
- Palliative care nurses' views on their retention intention: a qualitative study.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward premature ovarian insufficiency: a cross-sectional study among women of childbearing age.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices among patients with diabetes mellitus and hyperuricemia toward disease self-management.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Exploring the needs and coping strategies of family caregivers taking care of dying patients at home: a field study.BMC palliative care · 2023Article
- Hospice preference of the family decision-makers for cancer patients in China: an exploratory study.BMC palliative care · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate why patients with terminal illness and their families in Shanghai choose the hospice ward and their decision-making process.
methodsThis was a mixed-method study consisting of a cross-sectional survey and a descriptive qualitative study. Medical decision-makers for patients hospitalized in hospice wards were recruited between September 2019 and July 2021. A medical decision-maker is a family member who makes medical decisions for a patient. All 146 participants completed a self-developed 10-item questionnaire that included five items about their demographic characteristics and five items about the decision-making process. The semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine participants to understand the family's decision-making process when they chose a hospice ward. The interviews were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.
resultsThe mean age of the 146 participants was 57.6 years old. Of the decision-makers, 56.85% were the patients' children. Family-dominated discussions involving other family members were the main decision-making mode (84.93%). Patient participation in the decision-making process was reported in 43.15% of families. The participation of doctors (17.81%) and nurses (2.05%) were reported in a small number of families. The most common reason for choosing the hospice ward was the inability to find any other hospital for the patients (82.19%). The most common ways to learn about the service were neighbors and friends (38.36%) and social media (28.77%). Two themes and six categories emerged from the interviews. The first theme was reasons for choosing hospice wards. The reasons included being unable to care for the patients at home, staying in a hospice ward could reduce the psychological stress for home care, being unable to be admitted into tertiary/secondary hospitals, and thinking a hospice ward was a suitable place for the family. The second theme was the decision process of choosing a hospice ward. This theme included the following two categories, i.e., ways to learn about the hospice ward and family-discussion decision mode.
conclusionTo most families having dying patients, a hospice ward is a reasonable and balanced choice after the families experience huge care stress and practical difficulties. The participation of patients should be encouraged in the family discussion so that their wishes can be known. More efforts will be needed to guide the families with dying patients to make reasonable medical choices. Social media can be a good way to improve public awareness of hospice services in the future. Meanwhile, healthcare providers should be more involved in the decision-making process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.