ArticleJournal of obsessive-compulsive and related disorders2021
A Standardized Approach to Calculating Clinically Significant Change in Hoarding Disorder Using the Saving Inventory-Revised.
Article in Journal of obsessive-compulsive and related disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for comorbid major depressive disorder and hoarding disorder: An open label pilot study.Journal of affective disorders · 2026Trial
- Cognitive rehabilitation and exposure/sorting therapy for hoarding disorder: A randomized controlled trial.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology · 2026Trial
- Augmenting group hoarding disorder treatment with virtual reality discarding: A pilot study in older adults.Journal of psychiatric research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
This shorter communication explores the concept of clinically significant change in treatment outcome studies for hoarding disorder. We argue that cross-study comparisons have been hindered due to researchers using different formulations to assess individual change. As a result, we propose that researchers adopt a standardized approach to calculating rates of clinically significant change for the Saving Inventory-Revised (SI-R) based on Jacobson and Truax's (1991) two-step method. Specifically, we recommend that individuals whose SI-R total scores have reduced by at least 20 points and whose post-treatment score is 38 or less be classified as
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.