ArticleJournal of cardiology cases2022
A case of a coronary covered stent for repeated restenosis at the anastomosis site between saphenous vein graft and graft prosthesis.
Article in Journal of cardiology cases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A 56-year-old man was admitted with a diagnosis of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, after surgery for total arch replacement, aortic root replacement with a mechanical aortic valve, and coronary artery reconstruction by the Piehler method for acute aortic dissection. Coronary angiography (CAG) revealed a 99% stenosis of the anastomosis site between the J Graft (Japan Lifeline, Tokyo, Japan) and the saphenous vein graft (SVG), which was distally sutured to his right coronary artery (posterior descending artery). After percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a drug-eluting stent to the anastomosis site, repeated in-stent restenosis unfortunately occurred. Despite repeated PCIs, he was again admitted due to exertional angina pectoris, with proven inferior myocardial ischemia by stress myocardial perfusion imaging. We therefore decided to use a coronary covered stent for the anastomosis site to seal neointimal proliferation. GRAFTMASTER 2.8/19 mm (Abbott, CA, USA) was implanted in the anastomosis site, and a follow-up CAG one-year later revealed that the covered stent was clearly opened. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper to demonstrate the usefulness of a covered stent for repeated restenosis of the anastomosis site between SVG and graft prostheses. <
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.