Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35079245›Full record

ArticleJournal of contemporary brachytherapy2021

Impact of hydrogel and hyaluronic acid rectal spacer on rectal dosimetry and toxicity in low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy: a multi-institutional analysis of patients' outcomes.

Yuan-Hong Lin, Wee Loon, Mark Tacey, Damien Bolton, Alwin Tan, Yee Chan, Chee Wee Cham, Huong Ho, Mario Guerrieri, Farshad Foroudi and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Hyaluronic acid to manage radiotoxicities in gynecological cancer patients: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yuan-Hong LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia.
Wee LoonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia.
Mark TaceyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia.
Damien BoltonDepartment of Urology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia.
Alwin TanThe Bays Hospital, Mornington, Australia.
Yee ChanDepartment of Urology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia.
Chee Wee ChamThe Bays Hospital, Mornington, Australia.
Huong HoGenesis Cancer Care Victoria, Ringwood East, Australia.
Mario GuerrieriGenesis Cancer Care Victoria, Ringwood East, Australia.
Farshad ForoudiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia.
Daryl Lim JoonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia.
Kevin McMillanRingwood Private Hospital, Ringwood East, Australia.
George KoufogiannisRingwood Private Hospital, Ringwood East, Australia.
Paul ManoharRingwood Private Hospital, Ringwood East, Australia.
Madalena LiuRingwood Private Hospital, Ringwood East, Australia.
Trung PhamRingwood Private Hospital, Ringwood East, Australia.
Michael ChaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia.
Austin Health · AUParkwood Hospital · GBUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo report on rectal dosimetry and toxicity outcomes in men with prostate cancer (PCa) treated with iodine-125 low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) with or without polyethylene glycol hydrogel (HS) or hyaluronic acid (HA) rectal spacer (RS) insertion. MATERIAL AND

methodsSeventy consecutive men treated with LDR-BT between December 2017 and July 2019 were included in this study, including twenty-eight (40%) men who had RS insertion according to the preference of referring urologist, compared to a group of forty-two men (60%) without RS. Descriptive statistics were used to compare RS safety, dosimetric effects on organs at risk (rectum and urethra), and gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary toxicities (GU) (assessed using the CTCAE v.4) between the two groups of patients.

resultsThe median prostate-rectal separation with RS at mid prostate was 10 mm (IQR, 8-11.5 mm). The median follow-up was 23.5 months. There were no post-operative complications for RS insertion. There was significantly reduced rectal dosimetry in RS-group vs. non-RS group; the median RV

conclusionsInsertion of RS in men treated with LDR-BT is safe and resulted in a significant reduction in rectal dosimetry. The reduction in rectal dosimetry with RS insertion translates into significantly reduced acute and late GI toxicities.

Indexed as

low-dose-rate brachytherapyprostate cancerrectal dosimetryrectal spacerrectal toxicity

Identifiers

PMID35079245
PMCPMC8782075
OpenAlexW4206470878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.