ArticleContemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland)2021
Microbiology of breast tissue expanders.
Article in Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The Effect of Early Cultures and Dual-port Expanders on Two-stage, Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: The 25/25 Study.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
- Isolated Leptomeningeal Metastasis of Breast Cancer During Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy: A Case Report.Cureus · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionInfection is one of the most common complications of breast reconstruction. The presence of bacterial biofilm on the implant surface does not always manifest itself clinically as an infection. Still little is known about the factors that trigger the transition from a normal to a pathological state. The aim of study: To examine a specific profile of microorganisms associated with a tissue expander, and to ascertain whether the collection of intraoperative bacteriological swabs constitutes a significant predictive factor. Material and methods: A 2-centre review of outcomes of breast cancer patients who underwent immediate 2-stage expander-implant breast reconstruction between June 2020 and September 2021 was conducted. During this period, 68 replacements of expanders with implants from 56 women were performed. A bacteriological swab was taken from each expander compartment, and microbiological culture was performed. Patients' characteristics were taken into consideration.
resultsTissue expanders were implanted from 2 to 26 months. Seven patients had an emergency expander removed due to infection or damage to the device. Out of all 56 patients evaluated, 47 had a negative and 9 had a positive culture, 1 in both breasts. The results did not correlate closely with the clinical status.
conclusionsBacteria colonize both clinically normal and infected expanders. It is difficult to determine the specific flora associated with the pocket after expander-based reconstruction, and taking a bacteriological swab each time as a standard does not influence the success of treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.