ArticleReumatologia2021
Vaccination in rheumatic disease patients: results of a pilot quality improvement program.
Article in Reumatologia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving Vaccine Coverage Among Older Adults and High-Risk Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Hospital-Based Strategies.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
- Influenza knowledge and barriers to vaccination in immunosuppressed patients in the pediatric rheumatology clinic.Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesPatients with rheumatic diseases (RD) are at increased risk of infections. Vaccination is recognized as a successful public health measure and is recommended for RD patients. The aim of this study was to describe the strategies implemented in an academic rheumatology outpatient clinic as part of a fellow-in-training-led vaccination quality improvement (QI) program and to explore the vaccination uptake before and one year after the implementation. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe program's objective is the promotion of vaccination among patients and rheumatology fellows (by educational interventions, development of vaccination charts and orders, and modifications to electronic medical records to register vaccination dates and generate reminders). As part of the continuous evaluation of the QI program, a descriptive cross-sectional study was performed to evaluate vaccine uptake pre- and post-interventions and vaccination barriers one year after implementation. Consecutive patients with RD answered a self-administered questionnaire. Results are shown as descriptive statistics.
resultsBefore the program started 73 patients were surveyed and 102 patients one year after. The vaccination uptake rates for influenza pre- and post-interventions were 43% and 55%; for pneumococcal vaccination they were 26% and 30%; for herpes zoster they were 0% and 4%; for human papillomavirus they were 4% and 10%; for hepatitis B (HBV) they were 19% and 25% respectively. Eighty percent of patients reported some barriers to receiving any of the previous vaccines. The three main reasons for not receiving a vaccine were the lack of recommendation, the lack of availability, and the belief that vaccines do not work.
conclusionsThe implementation of a pilot vaccination QI program led by rheumatology fellows-in-training showed promising preliminary benefits in the vaccination uptake among RD patients and helps to evaluate the barriers to surpass.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.