Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35078911›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2022

'That is a Ministry of Health thing': Article 5.3 implementation in Uganda and the challenge of whole-of-government accountability.

Denis Male, Rob Ralston, Kellen Nyamurungi, Jeff Collin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Denis MaleDepartment of Food Technology and Nutrition, School of Food Technology Nutrition and Bioengineering, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Rob RalstonGlobal Health Policy Unit, Social Policy, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK Rob.Ralston@ed.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8664-3565
Kellen NyamurungiSchool of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Jeff CollinGlobal Health Policy Unit, Social Policy, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Global Policy Institute · USMakerere University · UG

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P027946/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWhile Uganda has made legislative progress towards implementing Article 5.3 of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), ongoing challenges in minimising tobacco industry interference have not been adequately explored. This analysis focuses on understanding difficulties in managing industry engagement across government ministries and in developing effective whole-of-government accountability for tobacco control.

methodsInterviews with Uganda government officials within the health sector and beyond, including in Ministries of Trade, Agriculture and Revenue.

resultsThe findings indicate substantial variations in awareness of Article 5.3, its norm and practices across government sectors. The data suggest ambiguity and uncertainty about accountability for Article 5.3 implementation, with policy makers in departments beyond health often uncertain about obligations under the FCTC. Second, we highlight how responsibility for Article 5.3 implementation and the obligations incurred are widely seen as restricted to the Ministry of Health. Third, competing mandates and perceived difficulties in reconciling health goals with economic growth are shown to impact on accountability for tobacco control. Yet, importantly, the data also demonstrate enthusiasm in some unexpected parts of government for actively engaging with Article 5.3 and for promoting greater intersectoral coordination.

conclusionThis paper demonstrates the intrinsic challenges of developing whole-of-government approaches, highlighting considerable uncertainty and ambiguity among decision makers in Uganda about tobacco control governance. The analysis points to the potential for Uganda's national coordinating mechanism to help reconcile competing expectations and demonstrate the importance of Article 5.3 beyond health actors.

Indexed as

Tobacco IndustryTobacco ProductsGovernmentHealth PolicySocial ResponsibilityUgandaWorld Health Organizationglobal healthlow/middle income countrypublic policytobacco industry

Identifiers

PMID35078911
PMCPMC9125367
OpenAlexW4207060655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.