Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35078848›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

University population-based prospective cohort study of SARS-CoV-2 infection and immunity (SARSSURV-ULiège): a study protocol.

Anne-Françoise Donneau, Michèle Guillaume, Vincent Bours, Margaux Dandoy, Gilles Darcis, Daniel Desmecht, Anh Nguyet Diep, Laurence Fievez, Mutien-Marie Garigliany, Nicolas Gillain and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anne-Françoise DonneauBiostatistics Unit - Public Health Department, Liège University, Liège, Belgium afdonneau@uliege.be.ORCID 0000-0002-5385-6289
Michèle GuillaumeBiostatistics Unit - Public Health Department, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.
Vincent BoursHuman Genetics Department, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Margaux DandoyCOVID-19 Platform of University of Liège, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.
Gilles DarcisInfectious Diseases Department, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Daniel DesmechtDepartment of Pathology, FARAH, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.
Anh Nguyet DiepBiostatistics Unit - Public Health Department, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5134-3220
Laurence FievezLaboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, GIGA Institute, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.
Mutien-Marie GariglianyDepartment of Pathology, FARAH, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.
Nicolas GillainBiostatistics Unit - Public Health Department, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.
Eddy HussonBiostatistics Unit - Public Health Department, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.
Fabienne MichelRécolte et Analyse de Données et d'Information d'Utilité Stratégique (RADIUS), Liège University, Liège, Belgium.
Michel MoutschenInfectious Diseases Department, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Marine ParidansPublic Health Department, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.
Pétre BenoîtPublic Health Department, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.
Catherine SabatelLaboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, GIGA Institute, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.
Claude SaegermanFundamental and Applied Research for Animal and Health (FARAH) Center, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.
Amandine TytgatLaboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, GIGA Institute, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.
Laurent Gillet *Laboratory of Immunology-Vaccinology, FARAH, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.
Fabrice Bureau *Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, GIGA Institute, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.
University of Liège · BECentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFor a safe and sustainable return to normal functioning of academic activities in higher education, objective-driven testing strategies that are flexible and rapidly adaptable are essential to effectively monitor and respond to new developments of the COVID-19 pandemic. To date, prospective longitudinal research on SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing in saliva and seroprevalence in higher education contexts is substantially lacking, limiting our understanding of COVID-19 prevalence, incidence and nature of the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 at various stages of the infection and vaccination. To address this lack of evidence, a prospective population-based cohort study (SARSSURV-ULiège) has recently been started. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Students (n=1396) and staff members (n=1143) of the University of Liège are followed up over more than 1 year. All participants are required to complete anamnestic, clinical and vaccine hesitancy questionnaires for medical histories and undertaken treatments. Previous proven or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection is also registered. In phase 1, weekly saliva samples to perform RT-qPCR to detect SARS-CoV-2 and monthly COVID-19 serological rapid test results are collected. Once being positive to either saliva RT-qPCR assay for SARS-CoV-2 presence or to serological test, the participant is invited to enter phase 2. If participants get vaccinated during the study period, they are invited to phase 2. In this second phase, besides weekly saliva self-test, depending on the participants' profiles, both gargle and blood samples are collected to obtain various biological data to measure the presence of neutralising antibodies against SARS-CoV-2, determine the magnitude and the duration of antibody responses over time. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has received the approval from the University Hospital of Liège Ethics Committee (reference number 2021/96, dated 26 March 2021). Potential protocol amendments will be presented to the Research Ethics Committee. The findings of the present study will be presented at scientific conferences and the results published in peer-review publications. Weekly reports will be submitted to the risk assessment group and the risk management group against COVID-19 of the university to enable a timely public health action if necessary.

Indexed as

COVID-19Cohort StudiesHumansPandemicsProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Seroepidemiologic StudiesVaccination HesitancyCOVID-19epidemiologyimmunologypublic health

Identifiers

PMID35078848
PMCPMC8795924
OpenAlexW4206930699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.