Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35078543›Full record

ArticleZoological letters2022

Ultrastructure of cerebral eyes in Oweniidae and Chaetopteridae (Annelida) - implications for the evolution of eyes in Annelida.

Günter Purschke, Stepan Vodopyanov, Anjilie Baller, Tim von Palubitzki, Thomas Bartolomaeus, Patrick Beckers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zoological letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. New fossil ofRoyal Society open science · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Günter PurschkeZoology and Developmental Biology, Department of Biology and Chemistry, Osnabrück University, Osnabrück, Germany. gpurschk@uni-osnabrueck.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2572-3390
Stepan VodopyanovDepartment of Invertebrate Zoology, Biological Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Anjilie BallerZoology and Developmental Biology, Department of Biology and Chemistry, Osnabrück University, Osnabrück, Germany.
Tim von PalubitzkiZoology and Developmental Biology, Department of Biology and Chemistry, Osnabrück University, Osnabrück, Germany.
Thomas BartolomaeusInstitute of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Patrick BeckersInstitute of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Osnabrück University · DEUniversity of Bonn · DELomonosov Moscow State University · RUUniversity of Vechta · DE

Funding

deutscher akademischer austauschdienst Ostpartnerschaften; Vladimir Vernadskij Programm
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent phylogenomic studies have revealed a robust, new hypothesis of annelid phylogeny. Most surprisingly, a few early branching lineages formed a basal grade, whereas the majority of taxa were categorized as monophyletic Pleistoannelida. Members of these basal groups show a comparatively simple organization lacking certain characters regarded to be annelid specific. Thus, the evolution of organ systems and the characteristics probably present in the last common annelid ancestor require reevaluation. With respect to light-sensitive organs, a pair of simple larval eyes is regarded as being present in their last common ancestor. However, the evolutionary origin and structure of adult eyes remain obscure. Typically, adult eyes are multicellular pigment cups or pinhole eyes with or without a lens comprising rhabdomeric photoreceptor cells (PRCs) and pigmented supportive cells (PSCs) in converse design. However, in the most basal lineages, eyes are only present in a few taxa, and thus far, their ultrastructure is unknown.

resultsUltrastructural investigations of members of Oweniidae and Chaetopteridae reveal a corresponding design of adult cerebral eyes and PRCs. The eyes in species of these groups are simple pigment spot eyes, either forming a flat patch or embedded in a tube-like invagination. They are part of the epidermis and comprise two cell types, PSCs and rhabdomeric PRCs. Both cell types bear microvilli and one more or less reduced cilium. However, the PRCs showed only a moderate increase in the apical membrane surface in the form of irregularly arranged microvilli intermingling with those of the PSCs; a densely arranged brush border of rhabdomeric microvilli was absent. Additionally, both cell types show certain characteristics elsewhere observable in typical epidermal supportive cells.

conclusionsThese findings shed new light on the evolutionary history of adult eyes in Annelida. Most likely, the adult eye of the annelid stem species was a pair of simple pigment spot eyes with only slightly specialized PSCs and PRCs being an integrative part of the epidermis. As is the case for the nuchal organs, typical pigment cup adult eyes presumably evolved later in the annelid phylogeny, namely, in the stem lineages of Amphinomida and Pleistoannelida.

Indexed as

AnnelidaChaetopteriformiaCiliary photoreceptor cellPalaeoannelidaPigment cellPigment cup eyePigment spot eyePolychaetesRhabdomeric photoreceptor cell

Identifiers

PMID35078543
PMCPMC8787891
OpenAlexW4206921329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.