Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35078541›Full record

ArticleContraception and reproductive medicine2022

Magnitude and determinants of unmet need for family planning among reproductive age women in East Africa: multilevel analysis of recent demographic and health survey data.

Melsew Setegn Alie, Gossa Fetene Abebe, Yilkal Negesse

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contraception and reproductive medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Melsew Setegn AlieDepartment of Reproductive health and Human nutrition, School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Science, Mizan-Tepi University, P.O.Box 260, Mizan-Aman, Ethiopia. melsewsetegn2010@mtu.edu.et.
Gossa Fetene AbebeDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Science, Mizan-Tepi University, P.O.Box 260, Mizan-Aman, Ethiopia.
Yilkal NegesseDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Science Mizan-Tepi University, P.O. Box 26o, Mizan-Aman, Ethiopia.
Mizan Tepi University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUnmet need for family planning is the main obstacle to achieve healthy timing and desired number of children. Decreasing the unmet need for FP respects and protects human right and help to decrease the influence on biodiversity. Unmet need for family planning is the contributor and devastating issue of maternal health. Therefore, meeting the unmet need of contraceptive averts the maternal death and poverty. Therefore, determining the magnitude and its determinants is very important to intervene and design appropriate program umbrella.

objectiveTo determine the magnitude and its determinants of unmet need for family planning among reproductive age women in East Africa.

methodThis study was analyzed secondary data from Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) of which contained detailed family planning for all interviewed women aged 15 to 49 years. The data were weighted using sampling weight before any statistical analysis to account the sampling design. STATA version 15 was used for extracting, editing, recoding, and multilevel analysis. Median odds ratio (MOR), proportional change in Variance (PCV), Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Akaike Information Criteria (AIC) was analyzed. Four model was build and the best model was selected based on the smallest Akaike Information Criteria (AIC). Both bivariable and multivariable multilevel analysis was done. Variable with p-value< 0.25 were selected for multivariable multilevel logistic regression analysis. Variables with p-value ≤5% declared as statistical significant with outcome variable.

resultsThe magnitude of unmet need for family planning was 24.66% (95%CI: 24.1-25.2). The identified determinants of unmet need for family planning was 30-39 years (AOR = 0.7; 95% CI 0.54-0.91), age of 40-49 (AOR = 0.76; 95% CI 0.58-0.99), rural residence (AOR = 1.17; 95% CI 1.02-1.34), female household head (AOR = 0.66; 95% CI 0.61-0.73), women having 4-6 child (AOR = 1.76; 95% CI 1.55-1.99), women having 7-9 child (AOR = 2.77; 95% CI 2.34-3.28) women having ≥10 child (AOR = 3.51; 95% CI 2.58-4.78), women who give their first birth 19-25 years (AOR = 1.1; 95% CI 1.0-1.26), 26-34 years (AOR = 1.4; 95% CI 1.19-1.83) ≥35 years (AOR = 2.1; 95% CI 1.1-4.27) and no fertility desire (AOR = 1.52; 95% CI 1.36-1.67) were the determinants of unmet need for family planning in east Africa.

conclusionUnmet need in east Africa is high as compare to other previous study. Maternal age, residence, sex of household head, number of children, age at first birth and fertility desire were the determinants identified in this study. Therefore, health interventions that reduce unmet need which enhance family planning service delivery among rural, male-headed household, women having more than three children and women who had no fertility desire needed in advance. Policies and programs of unmet need should be tailored the rural, young and no fertility desire women as well as male headed households.

Indexed as

East AfricaFamily planningReproductive age womenUnmet need

Identifiers

PMID35078541
PMCPMC8788073
OpenAlexW4210634662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.