Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35078539›Full record

ArticleAnimal microbiome2022

Gut microbiota of the threatened takahē: biogeographic patterns and conservation implications.

Annie G West, Anne DeLaunay, Phil Marsh, Elena K Perry, Megan Jolly, Brett D Gartrell, An Pas, Andrew Digby, Michael W Taylor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal microbiome, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Annie G WestSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2252-3828
Anne DeLaunaySchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.
Phil MarshTakahē Recovery Programme, Department of Conservation, Lakefront Drive, Te Anau, New Zealand.
Elena K PerrySchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.
Megan JollySchool of Veterinary Science, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Brett D GartrellSchool of Veterinary Science, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
An PasNew Zealand Centre for Conservation Medicine, Auckland Zoo, Auckland, New Zealand.
Andrew DigbyTakahē Recovery Programme, Department of Conservation, Lakefront Drive, Te Anau, New Zealand.
Michael W TaylorSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand. mw.taylor@auckland.ac.nz.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Aotearoa New Zealand takahē (Porphyrio hochstetteri), once thought to be extinct, is a nationally threatened flightless rail under intensive conservation management. While there has been previous research into disease-related microbes in takahē, little is known about the microbes present in the gastrointestinal tract. Given the importance of gut-associated microbes to herbivore nutrition and immunity, knowledge of these communities is likely to be of considerable conservation value. Here we examined the gut microbiotas of 57 takahē at eight separate locations across Aotearoa New Zealand.

resultsFaecal samples, taken as a proxy for the hindgut bacterial community, were subjected to 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing using Illumina MiSeq. Phylogenetic analysis of > 2200 amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) revealed nine main bacterial phyla (Acidobacteriota, Actinobacteriota, Bacteroidota, Campilobacterota, Firmicutes, Fusobacteriota, Planctomycetota, Proteobacteria, and Verrucomicrobiota) that accounted for the majority of sequence reads. Location was a significant effect (p value < 0.001, 9999 permutations) that accounted for 32% of the observed microbiota variation. One ASV, classified as Lactobacillus aviarius, was present in all samples at an average relative abundance of 17% (SD = 23.20). There was strong evidence (p = 0.002) for a difference in the abundance of the genus Lactobacillus between locations. A common commensal bacterium previously described in takahē, Campylobacter spp., was also detected in most faecal samples.

conclusionsLocation plays a pivotal role in the observed variation among takahē gut bacterial communities and is potentially due to factors such as supplemental feeding and medical treatment experienced by birds housed in captivity at one of the eight sampled sites. These data present a first glimpse of the previously unexplored takahē gut microbiota and provide a baseline for future microbiological studies and conservation efforts.

Indexed as

AvianBirdConservationEndangeredMicrobiomeMicrobiota

Identifiers

PMID35078539
PMCPMC8790836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.