Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35078504›Full record

ReviewGenome biology2022

Comparative assessment of genes driving cancer and somatic evolution in non-cancer tissues: an update of the Network of Cancer Genes (NCG) resource.

Lisa Dressler, Michele Bortolomeazzi, Mohamed Reda Keddar, Hrvoje Misetic, Giulia Sartini, Amelia Acha-Sagredo, Lucia Montorsi, Neshika Wijewardhane, Dimitra Repana, Joel Nulsen and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genome biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Telomere Crisis Shapes Cancer Evolution.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. When neighbors play a role: A systems-level analysis of protein interactions conditioning cancer driver mutation effects.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Interpretability-guided RNA NCommunications biology · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa Dressler *Cancer Systems Biology Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK.
Michele Bortolomeazzi *Cancer Systems Biology Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK.
Mohamed Reda Keddar *Cancer Systems Biology Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK.
Hrvoje Misetic *Cancer Systems Biology Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK.
Giulia Sartini *Cancer Systems Biology Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK.
Amelia Acha-Sagredo *Cancer Systems Biology Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK.
Lucia Montorsi *Cancer Systems Biology Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK.
Neshika WijewardhaneCancer Systems Biology Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK.
Dimitra RepanaCancer Systems Biology Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK.
Joel NulsenCancer Systems Biology Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK.
Jacki GoldmanScientific Computing, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK.
Marc PollittScientific Computing, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK.
Patrick DavisScientific Computing, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK.
Amy StrangeScientific Computing, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK.
Karen AmbroseScientific Computing, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK.
Francesca D CiccarelliCancer Systems Biology Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK. francesca.ciccarelli@crick.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-9325-0900
King's College London · GBThe Francis Crick Institute · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK C43634/A25487Cancer Research UK C604/A25135Cancer Research UK C7893/A26233Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust FC001002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenetic alterations of somatic cells can drive non-malignant clone formation and promote cancer initiation. However, the link between these processes remains unclear and hampers our understanding of tissue homeostasis and cancer development.

resultsHere, we collect a literature-based repertoire of 3355 well-known or predicted drivers of cancer and non-cancer somatic evolution in 122 cancer types and 12 non-cancer tissues. Mapping the alterations of these genes in 7953 pan-cancer samples reveals that, despite the large size, the known compendium of drivers is still incomplete and biased towards frequently occurring coding mutations. High overlap exists between drivers of cancer and non-cancer somatic evolution, although significant differences emerge in their recurrence. We confirm and expand the unique properties of drivers and identify a core of evolutionarily conserved and essential genes whose germline variation is strongly counter-selected. Somatic alteration in even one of these genes is sufficient to drive clonal expansion but not malignant transformation.

conclusionsOur study offers a comprehensive overview of our current understanding of the genetic events initiating clone expansion and cancer revealing significant gaps and biases that still need to be addressed. The compendium of cancer and non-cancer somatic drivers, their literature support, and properties are accessible in the Network of Cancer Genes and Healthy Drivers resource at http://www.network-cancer-genes.org/ .

Indexed as

NeoplasmsOncogenesClonal EvolutionHumansMutationCancer initiationDriver genesSomatic evolutionSystems-level properties

Identifiers

PMID35078504
PMCPMC8790917
OpenAlexW4210712554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.