Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35078470›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2022

A machine learning approach for modeling decisions in the out of hospital cardiac arrest care workflow.

Samuel Harford, Marina Del Rios, Sara Heinert, Joseph Weber, Eddie Markul, Katie Tataris, Teri Campbell, Terry Vanden Hoek, Houshang Darabi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Samuel HarfordDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Marina Del RiosDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa - Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA. marina-delrios@uiowa.edu.
Sara HeinertDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Joseph WeberDepartment of Emergency Medicine, John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA.
Eddie MarkulIllinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Katie TatarisDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Teri CampbellDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Terry Vanden HoekDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Houshang DarabiDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

Strengthening Stakeholder Engagement in Human Research Protections.UL1TR002003 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI KARNIK, NIRANJAN SUBHASH, MERMELSTEIN, ROBIN J. · 2016 to 2024
$33.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA growing body of research has shown that machine learning (ML) can be a useful tool to predict how different variable combinations affect out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survival outcomes. However, there remain significant research gaps on the utilization of ML models for decision-making and their impact on survival outcomes. The purpose of this study was to develop ML models that effectively predict hospital's practice to perform coronary angiography (CA) in adult patients after OHCA and subsequent neurologic outcomes.

methodsWe utilized all (N = 2398) patients treated by the Chicago Fire Department Emergency Medical Services included in the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES) between 2013 and 2018 who survived to hospital admission to develop, test, and analyze ML models for decisions after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and patient survival. ML classification models, including the Embedded Fully Convolutional Network (EFCN) model, were compared based on their ability to predict post-ROSC decisions and survival.

resultsThe EFCN classification model achieved the best results across tested ML algorithms. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for CA and Survival were 0.908 and 0.896 respectively. Through cohort analyses, our model predicts that 18.3% (CI 16.4-20.2) of patients should receive a CA that did not originally, and 30.1% (CI 28.5-31.7) of these would experience improved survival outcomes.

conclusionML modeling effectively predicted hospital decisions and neurologic outcomes. ML modeling may serve as a quality improvement tool to inform system level OHCA policies and treatment protocols.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesOut-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestWorkflowAdultCardiopulmonary ResuscitationDecision MakingHumansMachine LearningModels, TheoreticalDecision modelingDeep learningMachine learningNeurological outcomeOut of hospital cardiac arrest

Identifiers

PMID35078470
PMCPMC8787933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.