Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35078444›Full record

Observational studyBMC cancer2022

An observational study of workflows to support fecal testing for colorectal cancer screening in primary care practices serving Medicaid enrollees.

Cynthia M Mojica, Rose Gunn, Robyn Pham, Edward J Miech, Ann Romer, Stephanie Renfro, Khaya D Clark, Melinda M Davis

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Data Challenges in Identifying Patients Due for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural Clinics.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2023
    Article
  5. Improving colorectal cancer screening in rural primary care: Preliminary effectiveness and implementation of a collaborative mailed fecal immunochemical test pilot.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cynthia M MojicaSchool of Social and Behavioral Health Sciences, College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, 2250 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA. Cynthia.Mojica@oregonstate.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7787-0747
Rose GunnOregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, 3030 SW Moody Ave, Portland, OR, 97201, USA.
Robyn PhamOregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, 3030 SW Moody Ave, Portland, OR, 97201, USA.
Edward J MiechCenter for Health Services Research, Regenstrief Institute, 1101 W 10th St, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Ann RomerOregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, 3030 SW Moody Ave, Portland, OR, 97201, USA.
Stephanie RenfroCenter for Health Systems Effectiveness, Oregon Health & Science University, 3030 SW Moody Ave, Portland, OR, 9720, USA.
Khaya D ClarkDepartment of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Melinda M DavisDepartment of Family Medicine and School of Public Health, Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, 3030 SW Moody Ave, Portland, OR, 97201, USA.
Oregon Health & Science University · USOregon State University · USRegenstrief Institute · US

Funding

Oregon Patient Centered Outcomes Research K12 ProgramK12HS022981 · AHRQ · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI GUISE, JEANNE-MARIE · 2014 to 2018
$4.1M
Prediciting and addressing colonoscopy non-adherence in community settingsR01CA218923 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI CORONADO, GLORIA D · 2018 to 2022
$3.5M
AHRQ HHS K12 HS022981Foundation for the National Institutes of Health R01CA218923NCI NIH HHS R01 CA218923Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute K12 HS022981 01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScreening supports early detection and treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC). Provision of fecal immunochemical tests/fecal occult blood tests (FIT/FOBT) in primary care can increase CRC screening, particularly in populations experiencing health disparities. This study was conducted to describe clinical workflows for FIT/FOBT in Oregon primary care practices and to identify specific workflow processes that might be associated (alone or in combination) with higher (versus lower) CRC screening rates.

methodsPrimary care practices were rank ordered by CRC screening rates in Oregon Medicaid enrollees who turned age 50 years from January 2013 to June 2014 (i.e., newly age-eligible). Practices were recruited via purposive sampling based on organizational characteristics and CRC screening rates. Data collected were from surveys, observation visits, and informal interviews, and used to create practice-level CRC screening workflow reports. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, qualitative data analysis using an immersion-crystallization process, and a matrix analysis approach.

resultsAll participating primary care practices (N=9) used visit-based workflows, and four higher performing and two lower performing used population outreach workflows to deliver FIT/FOBTs. However, higher performing practices (n=5) had more established workflows and staff to support activities. Visit-based strategies in higher performing practices included having dedicated staff identify patients due for CRC screening and training medical assistants to review FIT/FOBT instructions with patients. Population outreach strategies included having clinic staff generate lists and check them for accuracy prior to direct mailing of kits to patients. For both workflow types, higher performing clinics routinely utilized systems for patient reminders and follow-up after FIT/FOBT distribution.

conclusionsPrimary care practices with higher CRC screening rates among newly age-eligible Medicaid enrollees had more established visit-based and population outreach workflows to support identifying patients due for screening, FIT/FOBT distribution, reminders, and follow up. Key to practices with higher CRC screening was having medical assistants discuss and review FIT/FOBT screening and instructions with patients. Findings present important workflow processes for primary care practices and may facilitate the implementation of evidence-based interventions into real-world, clinical settings.

Indexed as

Occult BloodWorkflowColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMaleMedicaidMiddle AgedOregonPostal ServicePrimary Health CareUnited Statescolorectal cancerearly detection of cancerpopulation healthprimary health careunderserved populationsworkflow

Identifiers

PMID35078444
PMCPMC8787027
OpenAlexW4206916817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.