Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35078366›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2022

An unbiased test reveals no enrichment of sexually antagonistic polymorphisms on the human X chromosome.

Filip Ruzicka, Tim Connallon

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. On the resolution of sexual conflict over shared traits.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  2. Polygenic response of sex chromosomes to sexual antagonism.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Patterns and evolutionary consequences of pleiotropy.Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Filip RuzickaSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9089-624X
Tim ConnallonSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1962-4951
Monash University · AU

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_17228Medical Research Council MC_QA137853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutations with beneficial effects in one sex can have deleterious effects in the other. Such 'sexually antagonistic' (SA) variants contribute to variation in life-history traits and overall fitness, yet their genomic distribution is poorly resolved. Theory predicts that SA variants could be enriched on the X chromosome or autosomes, yet current empirical tests face two formidable challenges: (i) identifying SA selection in genomic data is difficult; and (ii) metrics of SA variation show persistent biases towards the X, even when SA variants are randomly distributed across the genome. Here, we present an unbiased test of the theory that SA variants are enriched on the X. We first develop models for reproductive

Indexed as

Chromosomes, Human, XPolymorphism, GeneticChromosomesGenomeHumansMutationSelection, Geneticempirical population genomicsFSThumanssex chromosomessexually antagonistic selectiontheoretical models

Identifiers

PMID35078366
PMCPMC8790371
OpenAlexW4210780266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.