Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35078353›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2022

Elephant seal foraging success is enhanced in Antarctic coastal polynyas.

Fernando Arce, Mark A Hindell, Clive R McMahon, Simon J Wotherspoon, Christophe Guinet, Robert G Harcourt, Sophie Bestley

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Fernando ArceInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129 Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7622-3791
Mark A HindellInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129 Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7823-7185
Clive R McMahonInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129 Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5241-8917
Simon J WotherspoonInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129 Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6947-4445
Christophe GuinetCentre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, CNRS, Villiers en Bois 79360, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2481-6947
Robert G HarcourtDepartment of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2113, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4666-2934
Sophie BestleyInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129 Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9342-669X
University of Tasmania · AUCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRMacquarie University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antarctic polynyas are persistent open water areas which enable early and large seasonal phytoplankton blooms. This high primary productivity, boosted by iron supply from coastal glaciers, attracts organisms from all trophic levels to form a rich and diverse community. How the ecological benefit of polynya productivity is translated to the highest trophic levels remains poorly resolved. We studied 119 southern elephant seals feeding over the Antarctic shelf and demonstrated that: (i) 96% of seals foraging here used polynyas, with individuals spending on average 62% of their time there; (ii) the seals exhibited more area-restricted search behaviour when in polynyas; and (iii) these seals gained more energy (indicated by increased buoyancy from greater fat stores) when inside polynyas. This higher-quality foraging existed even when ice was not present in the study area, indicating that these are important and predictable foraging grounds year-round. Despite these energetic advantages from using polynyas, not all the seals used them extensively. Factors other than food supply may influence an individual's choice in their use of feeding grounds, such as exposure to predation or the probability of being able to return to distant sub-Antarctic breeding sites.

Indexed as

Seals, EarlessAnimalsAntarctic RegionsIce CoverPredatory Behaviorbody conditiondrift ratesforaging behaviourMirounga leoninapost-polynyasSouthern Ocean

Identifiers

PMID35078353
PMCPMC8790345
OpenAlexW4210575614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.