ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2022
A mathematical model for phenotypic heterogeneity in breast cancer with implications for therapeutic strategies.
Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Estimating treatment sensitivity in synthetic and in vitro tumors using a random differential equation model.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025Article
- Negligible Long-Term Impact of Nonlinear Growth Dynamics on Heterogeneity in Models of Cancer Cell Populations.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2025Article
- Mathematical modeling of the effect of early detection in breast cancer treatment.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Biobanks in chronic disease management: A comprehensive review of strategies, challenges, and future directions.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Understanding and leveraging phenotypic plasticity during metastasis formation.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2023Article
- Statistical inference of the rates of cell proliferation and phenotypic switching in cancer.Journal of theoretical biology · 2023Article
- The role of tumor microenvironment in drug resistance: emerging technologies to unravel breast cancer heterogeneity.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Tipping the Balance: A Criticality Perspective.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inevitably, almost all cancer patients develop resistance to targeted therapy. Intratumour heterogeneity is a major cause of drug resistance. Mathematical models that explain experiments quantitatively are useful in understanding the origin of intratumour heterogeneity, which then could be used to explore scenarios for efficacious therapy. Here, we develop a mathematical model to investigate intratumour heterogeneity in breast cancer by exploiting the observation that HER2+ and HER2- cells could divide symmetrically or asymmetrically. Our predictions for the evolution of cell fractions are in quantitative agreement with single-cell experiments. Remarkably, the colony size of HER2+ cells emerging from a single HER2- cell (or vice versa), which occurs in about four cell doublings, also agrees with experimental results, without tweaking any parameter in the model. The theory explains experimental data on the responses of breast tumours under different treatment protocols. We then used the model to predict that, not only the order of two drugs, but also the treatment period for each drug and the tumour cell plasticity could be manipulated to improve the treatment efficacy. Mathematical models, when integrated with data on patients, make possible exploration of a broad range of parameters readily, which might provide insights in devising effective therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.