Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35078222›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2022

The Genome of the Poecilogonous Annelid Streblospio benedicti.

Christina Zakas, Nathan D Harry, Elizabeth H Scholl, Matthew V Rockman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Acceleration of genome rearrangement in clitellate annelids.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Assortative mating and mate-choice contributes to the maintenance of a developmental dimorphism in Streblospio benedicti.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christina ZakasDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9998-848X
Nathan D HarryDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, USA.
Elizabeth H SchollBioinformatics Research Center, North Carolina State University, USA.
Matthew V RockmanDepartment of Biology and Center for Genomics & Systems Biology, New York University, USA.
North Carolina State University · USNew York University · US

Funding

Evolution of early development regulation using a dimorphic modelF32GM108396 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI ZAKAS, CHRISTINA · 2014 to 2015
$110k
NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM108396
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Streblospio benedicti is a common marine annelid that has become an important model for developmental evolution. It is the only known example of poecilogony (where two distinct developmental modes occur within a single species) that is due to a heritable difference in egg size. The dimorphic developmental programs and life-histories exhibited in this species depend on differences within the genome, making it an optimal model for understanding the genomic basis of developmental divergence. Studies using S. benedicti have begun to uncover the genetic and genomic principles that underlie developmental uncoupling, but until now they have been limited by the lack of availability of genomic tools. Here, we present an annotated chromosomal-level genome assembly of S. benedicti generated from a combination of Illumina reads, Nanopore long reads, Chicago and Hi-C chromatin interaction sequencing, and a genetic map from experimental crosses. At 701.4 Mb, the S. benedicti genome is the largest annelid genome to date that has been assembled to chromosomal scaffolds. The complete genome of S. benedicti is valuable for functional genomic analyses of development and evolution, as well as phylogenetic comparison within the annelida and the Lophotrochozoa. Despite having two developmental modes, there is no evidence of genome duplication or substantial gene number expansions. Instead, lineage-specific repeats account for much of the expansion of this genome compared with other annelids.

Indexed as

AnnelidaPolychaetaAnimalsLarvaPhylogenySequence Analysis, DNAdevelopmental genomicslife-history evolutionLophotrochozoapoecilogony

Identifiers

PMID35078222
PMCPMC8872972
OpenAlexW4206964578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.