Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35077942›Full record

ArticleWater research2022

Reduction and liquid-solid partitioning of SARS-CoV-2 and adenovirus throughout the different stages of a pilot-scale wastewater treatment plant.

Maria Fernanda Espinosa, Matthew E Verbyla, Lucas Vassalle, Cintia Leal, Deborah Leroy-Freitas, Elayne Machado, Luyara Fernandes, Alcino Trindade Rosa-Machado, Juliana Calábria, Carlos Chernicharo and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Water research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Detecting SARS-CoV-2 in sludge samples: A systematic review.The Science of the total environment · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria Fernanda EspinosaFederal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais 31270-901, Brazil.
Matthew E VerbylaSan Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, United States.
Lucas VassalleFederal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais 31270-901, Brazil.
Cintia LealFederal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais 31270-901, Brazil.
Deborah Leroy-FreitasFederal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais 31270-901, Brazil.
Elayne MachadoFederal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais 31270-901, Brazil.
Luyara FernandesFederal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais 31270-901, Brazil.
Alcino Trindade Rosa-MachadoFederal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais 31270-901, Brazil.
Juliana CalábriaFederal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais 31270-901, Brazil.
Carlos ChernicharoFederal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais 31270-901, Brazil.
César Rossas Mota FilhoFederal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais 31270-901, Brazil. Electronic address: cesar@desa.ufmg.br.
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRSan Diego State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Investigating waterborne viruses is of great importance to minimizing risks to public health. Viruses tend to adsorb to sludge particles from wastewater processes by electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions between virus, aquatic matrix, and particle surface. Sludge is often re-used in agriculture; therefore, its evaluation is also of great interest to public health. In the present study, a pilot scale system treating real domestic wastewater from a large city in Brazil was used to evaluate the removal, the overall reduction, and liquid-solid partitioning of human adenovirus (HAdV), the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) and fecal indicators (F-specific coliphages and E. coli). The system consists of a high-rate algal pond (HRAP) post-treating the effluent of an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor. Samples were collected from the influent and effluent of each unit, as well as from the sludge of the UASB and from the microalgae biomass in the HRAP. Pathogens and indicators were quantified by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) (for HAdV), qPCR with reverse transcription (RTqPCR) (for SARS-CoV-2), the double agar plaque assay (for coliphages), and the most probable number (MPN) method (for E. coli). The removal and overall reduction of HAdV and SARS-CoV-2 was greater than 1-log

Indexed as

COVID-19Water PurificationAdenoviridaeAnaerobiosisBioreactorsEscherichia coliHumansRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2SewageWaste Disposal, FluidRNA, ViralSewageAdenovirusHigh-rate algal pondsSARS-CoV-2SewageSludgeUASBVirus removal

Identifiers

PMID35077942
PMCPMC8759026
OpenAlexW4205570422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.